2008-03-20 TKOHALA LLC - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

RHO: Does that answer your question? SIRACUSA: Yes. So 2a, the first motion should be based on 2a, and then it doesn’t much -, then the second two could be separate or -. RHO: Yes. SIRACUSA: They could be combined -. RHO: Yes. SIRACUSA: Because they’re both on the SMA. RHO: Well, I think Mr. Torigoe is asking that, or suggesting that they be separate. So it’ll be 2a, I would suggest that it’ll be 2, and then we go up to 1. DOMINGO: Mr. Chairman. SIRACUSA: Okay, I understand now. Thank you. RHO: Okay. Commissioner -. DOMINGO: Mr. Chairman, thank you very much. You know, with regards to the zoning bill that is on the Council level right now, and should they go ahead and revoke the zoning, actually what would be the status of that bill? Just be null and void and that’s it? And then that SMA permit would be also null and void, and it will reflect that -, this will be reflected in the General Plan? RHO: Director Yuen, maybe you can answer that question for us? YUEN: If the Council rezones the property to something that does not allow -, say, the Commission today can revoke the SMA permit or it can pass an SMA permit contingent on future Council action. If the Council then does not keep the zoning in place that would allow a 25-lot subdivision, then the SMA permit is null and void; it’s inconsistent with the zoning. None of those actions will change the General Plan itself. DOMINGO: But right now what does the General Plan permit -, what is permitted on the General Plan for this specific parcel? YUEN: The General Plan permits a range of things including a residential development of up to 6 units per acre. It doesn’t compel that the zoning be any particular density. DOMINGO: That’s a very important point that I hope the Council can look at because what we are doing is permitting or not permitting a development according to the General Plan. EXHIBIT A 21