My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-03-24 TSonny_Ventures_REZ05030
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-03-24 TSonny_Ventures_REZ05030
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 12:17:03 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 12:17:01 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SIRACUSA:Yeah. I was reading the Background Report; I like the idea ofthe <br />project being pedestrian friendly. But Im wondering why you didnt allow even one little bit <br />of commercial there so that there could be a, at least a convenience store so residents could <br />walk to that and, as part of being pedestrian friendly instead of having to go-, it looks like <br />where Norman pointed out the other commercial space is up mauka there. Maybe bike but <br />certainly not for a senior citizen to walk up to buy a container of milk. So Im wondering if <br />you would care to comment on that and let us understand your thinking in the matter. <br />DICKLER:Basically, the community didnt want commercial in that area when we <br />came before the Council. And then the park was more important to the community when we <br />went for the public hearings. So putting the park in we converted some of that space that <br />would have been necessary for an economic commercial site to the park that were dedicating <br />to the County. <br />BROOKS:OneotherthingthatIwouldsharewithyouthatmighthelpyou <br />understand why there was this shift in planning. When this property was originally zoned by <br />the previous owners there was none of the development down below especially in the way of <br />Costco and the various other shopping opportunities down there. By the time that this came <br />along it was deemed that even though we had the zoning for much higher density that for the <br />sake of keeping the community and traffic and everything that it would be better to eliminate <br />the idea of commercial in that area and this was discussed with the people with the Planning <br />Department and what have you in our initial strategy. So it was the fact that there had been <br />other shopping opportunities that had been created since the original conceptualization and <br />zoning. <br />SIRACUSA:May I? <br />GRAHAM:Do you have a follow up Commissioner Siracusa? <br />SIRACUSA:Yes, yes. So, there was some method whereby you, you polled the <br />residents in the area to get their, their take on this, to understand their preference? Were there <br />like public meetings or could you explain how you did that? <br />BROOKS:Sure. There were meetings with the then current County Councilman <br />for that area Mr. Curtis Tyler. <br />SIRACUSA:No Im referring to the residents. <br />BROOKS:Yes and well he is, he was a resident of Palisades at that time and also <br />we had talked with the residents of the Palisades community. We went to their community <br />meetings and talked with them and what have you as well. Yes maam. <br />SIRACUSA:Im referring to the residents of your subdivision the-. <br />BROOKS:The residents- <br />EXHIBIT A <br />4 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.