My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-03-24 TSonny_Ventures_REZ05030
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-03-24 TSonny_Ventures_REZ05030
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 12:17:03 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 12:17:01 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SIRACUSA:Yes I have one more question. There was mention in the background <br />report of an endangered uhiuhi tree and I understand it was outside the project area but Id <br />like to know where it is and if you have any specific plans regarding it? <br />BROOKS:We dont have specific plans regarding it because its not on our <br />property. But for the sake of your informing you of its location, Norman if you can point to <br />the Wainani Project which is directly above the Lokahi. When you go up above Kapuahi <br />Street it goes up above on that map tothe right youd have to-. <br />HAYASHI:Bill if you could? I dont want to point out the wrong place. <br />BROOKS:Yeah. <br />DICKLER:Thank you. This is Kapuahi Street that gets extended. This is owned, <br />theresanothersubdivisioncalledWainani42thatsnotownedbyustheyreownedbythird <br />parties and its up in this area Bill correct? <br />BROOKS:Yes thats correct. <br />DICKLER:At the north, at the mauka end of their property. So we have nothing to <br />do with them. <br />SIRACUSA:I find it very strange then that it was even mentioned in the Background <br />Report. <br />DICKLER:The reason-. Im sorry Ms. Siracusa the reason it was mentioned was <br />originally this was all one piece of property Haseko owned all 125 acres. It has since been <br />subdivided to 3 different developers. <br />SIRACUSA:Thank you. <br />BROOKS:To the best of my knowledge it is being preserved. <br />GRAHAM:Thank you. Norman just one other clarification, I know weve had <br />some after the fact rezonings in the past like down at the Mauna Lani and things and in those <br />cases I think we have some individual letters from the lot owners saying that its, that theyre <br />okay with it. Do we have that in this case also? <br />HAYASHI:Yes we do have that on file and that was submitted with the <br />application. <br />GRAHAM:Thank you. Another other questions from Commissioners? We only <br />have one person in the public. If you are intending to give any testimony please do so. Thank <br />you. Do you have anything further on behalf of the applicant? <br />DICKLER:No thank you. <br />EXHIBIT A <br />6 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.