Laserfiche WebLink
GIFFIN:Okay. <br />HAYASHI:Oh, I'm sorry, there's one more correspondence, and that <br />provided to you, from Tricia Carroll, and there is no date to that correspondence. <br />GIFFIN:Thank you, Norman. When we recessed, we recessed with the purpose of <br />the parties getting together and determining the sites that we would be looking at this morning at <br />our site visit. Randy? <br />VITOUSEK:Yeah. Sorry, Madam Chair. First, relative to the additional witness <br />testimonies that were submitted, you know, to the extent that these are written testimonies of a <br />witness who a party is calling, that, they're in a different category than public testimony. <br />GIFFIN:Exactly. <br />VITOUSEK:And IÓm not sure as to entirely how many of these witnesses are witnesses <br />who are listed; but I know Mr. Castelli was listed as a witness by Intervenor Roy. And so I think <br />we need to distinguish between -. <br />GIFFIN:Right. <br />VITOUSEK:Written testimony in the contested case hearing, which <br />examination -. <br />GIFFIN:Right. <br />VITOUSEK:And public testimony which is not, theoretically, subject to cross <br />examination. So -. <br />GIFFIN:Hang on just a minute. Mr. Torigoe. <br />TORIGOE:Thank you, Madam Chairman. I think normally as in your usual meetings, <br />if there is written testimony that is just presented as written public testimony, that is noted for the <br />record and is in the record, but as public testimony and not as contested case testimony subject to <br />cross examination. So if we can just note for the record the particular written testimony that's <br />being offered just as public testimony, and distinguish that on the record from, you know, the <br />other testimony that would be given in the context of the contested case, that would be sufficient. <br />GIFFIN:So then we should ask people like Mr. Castelli if this is simply public <br />testimony or if this is what he is going to be presenting as a w <br />TORIGOE:Well, you know, as a member of the public, he can basica <br />say anything that is reasonably relevant or maybe not even reasonably relevant regarding the <br />subject matter. So I don't want, I donÓt want to be, you know, <br />testimony on that basis. But I think it, you know, I think it would be reasonable also to remind <br />10 <br /> <br />