My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-04-01 TMOYLAN
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-04-01 TMOYLAN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 12:27:31 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 12:27:29 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SPRINGER:Doyou have any comments to make? <br />MOYLAN:No, no comments. <br />SPRINGER:Commissioners, do you haveanyquestions of the applicant? Seeing none, <br />at this time Id like to call our member of the public forward. <br />PAWU:Good afternoon, Chairperson and Members of the Commission. My name <br />is Miya Pawu. My address is PO Box 1707, Keaau, HI. And I come before you today <br />representing the community of Orchidland. I am the president of Orchidland Community <br />Association, so my testimony is on behalf of the community and not just my personal belief. <br />SIRACUSA:Excuse me, could you speak louder, please. <br />PAWU:Imsorry.Thisisthefirsttime,Ithink,Ms.Siracusa,Ivebeenaccused <br />for speaking too low. We are generally supportive of our members supporting their families <br />without commuting, without adding to the burden on our roadways. Our questions regarding this <br />application, and we were not, usually were given a copy of everyone of these because every <br />property in Orchidland borders the roadways and we are, the Orchidland Community <br />Association is the owner of the roadways or they administer the roadways. The roadways are <br />owned in common by our members; and therefore we are the administrative body in charge of <br />them. <br />Our questions regarding this particular special use permit are noise, which I believe this <br />Commission has addressed adequately. We do want to question how much traffic this will <br />generate. Because if its going to, it appears that they do mostly wholesale orders and therefore <br />there wont be a lot of extra traffic generated to the property. So that may be a minor concern; <br />and maybe this gentleman could answer that. And our last question, and weve had problems <br />with this in the past with other special use permits, is that we do feel its unfair to charge a <br />commercial operation the same road maintenance fee as a single family residence. We have a <br />fee schedule that has been established, voted on by our members at a vote counted by the League <br />of Women voters, and duly approved by our entire membership. A project such as this would <br />have a fee of approximately five times what a standard home would be. A standard home fee <br />currently is $65, its going up to $70. So they would be paying road fees because of the trucks <br />bringing things in and out that do put extra wear on our roads of approximately $300 a year. <br />And I believe that that was put as a condition of their special use permit. If they pay the fees as <br />the Board may designate, then we would have no further comments on this particular issue. <br />And, in fact, we are in favor, again, of our members being able to support themselves within our <br />community. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you, Mr. Pawu. Are there any questions for the testifier, members <br />of the Commission? Commissioner Siracusa. <br />SIRACUSA:Well, I have two questions. One is for Mr. Moylan; and that is if that <br />would be agreeable to him, that extra fee. And then Ill ask one of Mr. Pawu. <br />MOYAN:Yeah, that sounds very reasonable. Thats fine. <br />4 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.