My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-04-01 TVOLCANO
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-04-01 TVOLCANO
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 12:27:39 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 12:27:35 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MCKENNEY:We could put up signs, but we dont have police, we dont have <br />any real enforcement authority. We pretty much have to rely on, you know, the <br />provisions that are established. You know, we dont think its unreasonableto not use <br />our roads if its not necessary. In fact, thats part of the Planning Departments condition, <br />is that access be via Wright Road for exactly that reason, because its a public-maintained <br />highway, not a privately-owned road thats privately maintained by people. And the <br />church as far as I know is not a member of the Road Maintenance Corporation and would <br />not be required to be. And weve had controversies with other facilities within the thing <br />that raised real horrible issues about, okay, how do you determine what is an appropriate <br />fee given this number of cars and everything else. And we just as soon avoid that <br />nightmare if it can be accessed via the highway and we dont have associated traffic <br />problems. Thats all were asking. <br />SPRINGER:Thankyou.CommissionerGraham? <br />GRAHAM:Again,justtryingtoclarifythesamething.Ithinkwhatyoure <br />asking is that access only be on Wright Road, for one. And I think in our application <br />conditions we speak of the access to Wright Road, but we never say on these proposed <br />conditions that there shall be no access from Road A. So if we put that in the condition, I <br />would presume that would handle that problem. <br />MCKENNEY:Yeah, it sounds like as it is planned, it would probably work out. <br />But if we could have an explicit provision, kind of giving us a little more insulation, that <br />would be great. <br />GRAHAM:Okay. And then the other issue was that people might park on the <br />side of the road on Road A there, and we dont have any specific hard-and-fast remedy, <br />other than the fact that, I guess, we have no access from that road and presumably people <br />wouldnt park there. Is that adequate for you, or is there something in particular youd -? <br />MCKENNEY:Im not sure what we can do to really completely control that. I <br />mean, we have a 40-foot right-of-way that restricts, that we have some jurisdiction over, <br />that we try to maintain and control, but we dont actually own it so -. <br />GRAHAM:So maybe, you know, if the church here is in accord, they could <br />just accept that they will inform their members not to park on the side of Road A, and <br />that should handle it, huh? <br />MCKENNEY:Yeah, if they could -. We can put up signs; and if they could <br />encourage their people to, you know, cooperate with us, thatd be great. Its what were <br />after. <br />GRAHAM:Okay. Thank you. <br />MCKENNEY:I mean, were not objecting to the church itself. <br />10 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.