Laserfiche WebLink
are for safety, and I€m willing to pave our driveway. Now this isthe first time anybody <br />ever asked me to pave, up to, from the highway up to it for safety purposes. <br />I don€t want to talk too long and I lose track of time,but that€s basically where I€m <br />coming from. We€re doing our best to work with the neighbors, we€ve triedto call and <br />talk. We did have a good talk, but it ended; and now here we are. <br />I also, one more thing, I had two items. One was safety in the roads. The second was <br />commerce in the Park. We were fortunate to be probably the first commercial-approved <br />unit for the Park. We now get five phone calls a day with a full building and nobody <br />knows where to go. Call any self storage place in town, they€re all full. That€s why we <br />wanted to expand. It€s very hard to turn down people. <br />I was definitely trying to do the best of all this on the Board to get industry into the Park <br />forthePark,samepurposethatGarySafariktalkedaboutthismorning.Idon€tlike <br />driving 20 miles to get a sack of groceries, and that€s what has to happen, or gas tank, or <br />whatever. So I€m still for that. And, I mean, yes, I can understand people do not want <br />growth. In talking to Mr. Schneider, he also mentioned, the gentleman who sent two <br />letters to our, to you folks against the thing, and that was the lot in between us, he had <br />that lot on the market. At the time he wrote those letters he stated that he was going to be <br />living on it and this was an inconvenience to him; and learning from Mr. Schneider, he <br />sold it for $50,000, which is many more times than he paid for it. And the argument of <br />losing property values because we€re here, that€s the lot next door to us. So, I guess I€ll <br />shut up. Thank you. <br />SPRINGER:Mr. Vurich, and also for the Commissioners, what our focus now is <br />Mr. Schneider€s Request for Standing, not the merit of the application or any of the <br />particulars of it. So if we can return our focus to Mr. Schneider€s Petition for Standing in <br />the Contested Case Hearing. Are those your comments? <br />VURICH:My comments are it€s not adversely affecting his property value. <br />We€ve been there 4-1/2 years, we never had a complaint. I don€t know how to say it. <br />He€s saying, we€re also right across from the industrial park, as you€re well aware. It has <br />been zoned. At the time of our first permit, there was nowhere to go in the entire Park; <br />and we chose a lot across from the industrial park on purpose to be a buffer because we <br />don€t make noise, we don€t have barking dogs -. <br />SPRINGER:Mr. Vurich, again, if we can focus our comments on the Petition <br />for Standing rather than your circumstances. <br />VURICH:Okay. Yeah. My primary one was his comment that it€s affecting <br />his property values, and I€m saying I disagree. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you, sir. Commissioners -. <br />ALAMEDA:I have a question. <br />12 <br /> <br />