My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-04-01 TVURICH
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-04-01 TVURICH
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 12:27:49 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 12:27:43 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
are for safety, and Im willing to pave our driveway. Now this isthe first time anybody <br />ever asked me to pave, up to, from the highway up to it for safety purposes. <br />I dont want to talk too long and I lose track of time,but thats basically where Im <br />coming from. Were doing our best to work with the neighbors, weve triedto call and <br />talk. We did have a good talk, but it ended; and now here we are. <br />I also, one more thing, I had two items. One was safety in the roads. The second was <br />commerce in the Park. We were fortunate to be probably the first commercial-approved <br />unit for the Park. We now get five phone calls a day with a full building and nobody <br />knows where to go. Call any self storage place in town, theyre all full. Thats why we <br />wanted to expand. Its very hard to turn down people. <br />I was definitely trying to do the best of all this on the Board to get industry into the Park <br />forthePark,samepurposethatGarySafariktalkedaboutthismorning.Idontlike <br />driving 20 miles to get a sack of groceries, and thats what has to happen, or gas tank, or <br />whatever. So Im still for that. And, I mean, yes, I can understand people do not want <br />growth. In talking to Mr. Schneider, he also mentioned, the gentleman who sent two <br />letters to our, to you folks against the thing, and that was the lot in between us, he had <br />that lot on the market. At the time he wrote those letters he stated that he was going to be <br />living on it and this was an inconvenience to him; and learning from Mr. Schneider, he <br />sold it for $50,000, which is many more times than he paid for it. And the argument of <br />losing property values because were here, thats the lot next door to us. So, I guess Ill <br />shut up. Thank you. <br />SPRINGER:Mr. Vurich, and also for the Commissioners, what our focus now is <br />Mr. Schneiders Request for Standing, not the merit of the application or any of the <br />particulars of it. So if we can return our focus to Mr. Schneiders Petition for Standing in <br />the Contested Case Hearing. Are those your comments? <br />VURICH:My comments are its not adversely affecting his property value. <br />Weve been there 4-1/2 years, we never had a complaint. I dont know how to say it. <br />Hes saying, were also right across from the industrial park, as youre well aware. It has <br />been zoned. At the time of our first permit, there was nowhere to go in the entire Park; <br />and we chose a lot across from the industrial park on purpose to be a buffer because we <br />dont make noise, we dont have barking dogs -. <br />SPRINGER:Mr. Vurich, again, if we can focus our comments on the Petition <br />for Standing rather than your circumstances. <br />VURICH:Okay. Yeah. My primary one was his comment that its affecting <br />his property values, and Im saying I disagree. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you, sir. Commissioners -. <br />ALAMEDA:I have a question. <br />12 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.