My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-04-01 TVURICH
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-04-01 TVURICH
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 12:27:49 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 12:27:43 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ALAMEDA:Just real quick for the Applicant and Mr. Vurich. Basically, what <br />will happen, if we grant standing, itllgo to hearing and then the hearing officer will, you <br />know, discuss it between both of you and then come back, come with a recommendation; <br />then we review, and we can agree with the recommendation or not. So no matter what <br />itll come back to this Commission, correct? <br />SPRINGER:Thats correct. Other Commissioners, any questions on process or <br />other matters? <br />IWASHITA:Id just like a clarification from Mr. -. <br />SPRINGER:Commissioner Iwashita? <br />IWASHITA:From the Applicant. So am I understanding you correctly that you <br />dontobjecttothisrequestforahearing,aseparatecontestedhearing? <br />VURICH:Thatiscorrect.Idprefernottohavetogothatwaybutifwehave <br />to, I dont object to it happening. I will continue through. <br />IWASHITA:Thank you. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you, sir. Commissioner Siracusa? <br />SIRACUSA:Yes, regarding process. As I recall, there are two ways we can go <br />on a Contested Case Hearing. We can take it out to a hearings officer or we can decide to <br />hear it ourselves, is that correct? <br />SPRINGER:Thats correct. First -. <br />SIRACUSA:So we would still have to make that decision? <br />SPRINGER:First we would take up the matter -. <br />SIRACUSA:Firstly, we take up whether Mr. Schneider has standing, is that -? <br />SPRINGER:First we take up the matter of his standing, and then whether or not <br />to outsource, or hear it by the panel as a whole, or some portion thereof. <br />SIRACUSA:Okay. That confirms what I was thinking. Thank you. <br />SPRINGER:Good. Youre welcome. Commissioners, any further discussion? <br />Okay. Our motion then is order on, a motion then is in order on the Petition for Standing <br />in a Contested Case Hearing by James Larry Schneider. <br />WATANABE:Id be happy to make a motion. <br />14 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.