Laserfiche WebLink
TORIGOE:I don€t see any lessening of the standard in your rules and I don€t <br />know off the top of my head of any, you know, case law that would legitimate that kind <br />of consideration. So that€s not something that I would encourage you to do it at this <br />point. <br />GRAHAM:Thank you. <br />SPRINGER:Other Commissioners? Any discussion at this point? We€re still <br />treating the Harlans€ request, their Petition for Standing in a Contested Case Hearing, as a <br />live application or an active application before us. <br />IWASHITA:So, then, would Mr. Schneider be presenting evidence to support <br />that request? <br />SPRINGER:Mr.Schneider,doyouhaveanythingmoretopresenttousin <br />addition to their written comments? <br />SCHNEIDER:No. Just the written comments. <br />SPRINGER:And that includes that 9-point correspondence that you referred to <br />previously? <br />SCHNEIDER:Yes. It€s their letter, I believe, dated February 16, 2005. <br />SPRINGER:Commissioners, do you have that before you to refer to? <br />thth <br />SCHNEIDER:Actually, it€s February 18. I€m sorry, it was the February 18 <br />letter. <br />SPRINGER:Commissioners, do we, what discussion do we have then on the <br />Petition for Standing in a Contested Case Hearing by John and Sarah Harlan? And we <br />th <br />have before us their February 18 written correspondence, as well as the hard copy of <br />this <br />e-mail that Sharon Nomura is circulating presently. <br />ALAMEDA:Madam Chair? <br />SPRINGER:Commissioner Alameda? <br />ALAMEDA:Are we now deliberating whether or not to make a motion for <br />Mr. and Mrs. Harlan€s standing? <br />SPRINGER:We€re evaluating whether or not they meet the criteria that we <br />have for standing. It seems to me that their primary concern is as nearby residence that <br />there€sthe,astheysayintheirpetition,thisvisualeyesorewillbedetrimentaltothe <br />value of our property.‚ <br />19 <br /> <br />