My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-04-01 TVURICH
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-04-01 TVURICH
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 12:27:49 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 12:27:43 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
photographs, and I believe Ive sent some to the Commission and the Planning <br />Department, which gives certain views of the properties in question. <br />SIRACUSA:Yes, and I believe that we have those. <br />SCHNEIDER:Yes. <br />SIRACUSA:So, do you feel that the viewplane issue is one of the ways in <br />which you have a special interest in this? <br />SCHNEIDER:I certainly do feel that way. <br />SIRACUSA:I mean, in your, that your interest differs from that of the general <br />public? <br />SCHNEIDER:Exactly. <br />SIRACUSA:Okay. Thank you. <br />SPRINGER:Commissioner Graham, and then Iwashita. <br />GRAHAM:Mr. Schneider, I just want to kind of broach a subject in a sense of <br />being helpful and not representative of the Planning Commission or anything like that. <br />But Im just thinking like probably your motivation is you dont like this proposal and so <br />youd like to see it turned down by the Commission. And my, the direction Im thinking <br />in is like is the Contested Case Hearing process a worthwhile vehicle for you to <br />undertake towards that objective; and, Mr. Torigoe, Im sure could give you the, little <br />details about what might be advantageous to you. But, essentially, it is a lot of extra <br />work for you and for the Applicant, not too much extra work for us cause generally we <br />have a Hearings Officer hear it and then it comes back to us for final decision. And so, to <br />me, whether its objectionable or not, this is a relatively straight-forward kind of <br />application so that the whole process of, you know, cross examining witnesses, and long <br />testimonies and things like that that can take place in Contested Case Hearings might be, <br />you know, less applicable to this particular application. So Im just sort of bringing all <br />this up in the sense of like I dont know if you thought in depth or not about whether it is <br />really worth it to you to do a Contested Case Hearing, because it may or may not be, you <br />know, highly advantageous to you to do it. I dont know the answers to those. But I just <br />wanted kind of broach the subject to get you thinking about it. And if you wanted to ask <br />the Corporation Counsel, or I could ask him about what are your advantages, you know, <br />legally or procedurally with us, we can certainly do that. But I just wanted to bring that <br />forward as something that occurred to me, so I wanted to bring it to you. <br />SCHNEIDER:Well, I have given it quite a bit of thought, as a matter of fact. Ive <br />been concerned ever since 1998 with the building of four large 100-foot long, 30-foot <br />wide buildings on a single acre in Paradise Park when, generally, we have a single-family <br />residence. We all know that its zoned agriculture and we all know that approximately <br />7 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.