My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-04-01 TVURICH
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-04-01 TVURICH
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 12:27:49 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 12:27:43 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SPRINGER:Director Yuen? <br />YUEN:Well, its upto the Commission to decide whether the individual in <br />questions interests are different enough from that of the general public to grant standing. <br />The fact that a person may have some additional financial burden as a member of the, as <br />the person that pays into a road maintenance fund is a factor that you could consider. <br />You have to, also, but standing by itself, that would seem, in this particular case, to be a <br />rather small factor, frankly. Because the additional amount that the Road Maintenance <br />Corporation will have to pay for this, youre probably talking a few dollars a year at the <br />most. I dont know what the total that they pay now is, but this would be a very slight <br />increase. If it does increase or cause a burden on the roads, its shared among, you know, <br />9,000 owners. Its a very slight burden to an individual owner. <br />IWASHITA:Iguessmyreadingoftherulesand,wouldbethateachclaimto <br />standing, the five that are listed, stands on its own. So if theres an interest in, if it can be <br />said that the undivided interest in the road equals, and in each owners deed has basically <br />that undivided interest in the road now -. So if it can be said that by our proceeding were <br />considering that interest as part of the application, then an owner in Paradise Park has <br />standing just on that one separate status as owning an interest in the property, you know, <br />collectively with the other 9,000 owners but they still own an interest in that. The <br />th <br />proprietary interest is the, that 1/9,000 <br /> Tenant-in-Common interest in the land, thats <br />owned jointly by all those people, right? <br />SPRINGER:That wouldmake them distinguishable from the rest of the public. <br />IWASHITA:No, its different. Thats the first criteria. You can have standing <br />by having a distinguishable, an interest distinguishable from the rest of the community; <br />but a separate claim for standing is, I have an interest in the property thats at issue <br />before the Commission. And -. <br />YUEN:But the, theyre not asking for a Special Permit for the use of the <br />road. Theyre asking for a Special Permit for the use of the privately-owned lots. <br />IWASHITA:I understand. Its just, my, you know, maybe its just, cause its a <br />title kind of issue. Part of the interest in owning the land, because this is not an access on <br />apublichighway,thisisaccessonaprivateroadownedby9,000ownersthatendsup <br />hooking up to a public highway. The interest in the land, this one acre, includes this <br />th <br />undividedone8959 interest, or whatever it is, in the road; and thats all a bundle of <br />rights together. <br />SPRINGER:And while thats an interestingpoint, Im not sure that thats the <br />onethatthePetitionerismaking. <br />SCHNEIDER:No.ButoneofthereasonsthatIhaveaskedforthespecial <br />hearing is so that numerous issues can be addressed, one of which is the road safety <br />9 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.