Laserfiche WebLink
would be the area we would be looking at is, is the interest clearly distinguishable from that of <br /> the general public? And so, in this particular case, these, this organization made up of a number <br /> of associations that surround this particular property, are clearly distinguishable from the general <br /> public in the fact that they are impacted by this particular, by the particular actions that are <br /> occurring on this property. So, from that standpoint, the Planning Department agrees that they <br /> would be allowed standing. We have no objection to that. <br /> VITOUSEK: Mahalo. So, getting back to the two options on the table for us now. One is to <br /> make a motion on the request for standing. Number two, if Planning Commissioners feel like <br /> additional consultation is needed, we can make a motion for executive session to discuss with <br /> our attorneys if that's something that you think is appropriate. <br /> KNOWLES: I'm comfortable with the motion to address standing. <br /> VITOUSEK: Okay. Okay. Okay, cool. Well, anybody can make that motion. <br /> KNOWLES: I'll go ahead. I move toI move that the petition be granted based on the record. <br /> Petitioner has established the criteria for standing,namely their interest is clearly distinguishable <br /> from that of the general public and/or that even though—well, yes, that, sorry. And that's it. <br /> KANUHA: I second. <br /> VITOUSEK: Okay. A motion and a second. Any discussion? Seeing none, we'll proceed with <br /> roll call vote. <br /> JACKSON: Commissioner Knowles? <br /> KNOWLES: Aye. <br /> JACKSON: Commissioner Kanuha? <br /> KANUHA: Aye. <br /> JACKSON: Commissioner DelaCruz? <br /> DELACRUZ: Aye. <br /> JACKSON: I'm sorry, Vice Chair, I skipped you. <br /> DEFRANCO: It's okay. <br /> JACKSON: Vice Chair DeFranco? <br /> DEFRANCO: Aye. <br /> JACKSON: And Chair Vitousek? <br /> 9 <br /> EXHIBIT G <br />