2005-04-01 TPULUWAI - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

SIRACUSA:So it would still be Kawailani that would be responsible for filing those old reports? SPRINGER:Excuse me, Commissioner, perhaps, at this time either the staff or the Planning Director can help explain the circumstancesthat Commissioner Siracusa is questioning upon. HAYASHI:Yes. If this time extension request were to be approved by the Council, then the applicant, Puluwai, would be responsible for submitting the annual report, so whoever the landowner would be thats going to be developing the property. SPRINGER:And, Norman, the reports that have not been submitted in a timely fashion, would those years still need to be reported on? HAYASHI:No,Idontbelievetheyneedtodothat.Perhapsinthefirstreportthey can state what had happened over the years, and then take it from there and explain to the Commission and the County Council as to what the developments timetable is or where they are in the development. SPRINGER:Thank you, Norman. Commissioner Siracusa, does that satisfy your question? SIRACUSA:Yes, it does. Thank you. SPRINGER:Youre welcome. Any other, Commissioners, questions either for the applicants representative or the staff? Once again, this is a public meeting. Is there anyone in the audience who wishes to testify on the matter before us now? Mr. Correia? CORREIA:Wed like to add something. I think Eddie and I, as well as another gentleman, is in pursuit of the project because, so to speak, it has been entitled, you know. We were hoping that we could come forward, get approvals and time extensions and, so to speak, run with the project, you know, kind of the way it left off. We have concerns now in something that has come before us that we didnt anticipate, its fair share. At the time in 92 that this ordinance was established and approved, there was no fair share cost, now amounting to $203,000 exactly. And we had hopes that the Planning Commission can approve the ordinance of 92 as it was in 92. Aside the fair share we have no, you know, concerns. Were paying a good price for the property to be able to develop it. And with that additional expense, it almost makes it prohibitive. SPRINGER:Thank you, Mr. Correia. Mr. Director, can you speak to that, please. YUEN:As a matter of standard practice, whenever we have one of these time extensions from old zonings that does not have a fair share requirement on it, we are recommending that it be added, just the same as if a property were coming in for zoning today. Otherwise, the point of the fair share contribution is as development occurs to create a fund for the off-site cost of development, because every project will add some traffic to the road system, every project will add people that will use the park systems off site. So if you have a piece of 5