My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-04-01 TPULUWAI
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-04-01 TPULUWAI
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 12:27:55 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 12:27:52 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
TORIGOE:Thats correct, Madam Chairman. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you. Thank you for waiting. Commissioner Watanabe. <br />WATANABE:My question is would it be possible, cause I dont know the particulars of <br />your agreement with the seller, would it be possible for you to then go back, assuming we are, <br />you know, recommending approval, and negotiate with the seller because of this development on <br />the fair share? <br />CORREIA:Right. Good point. Weve already done that. Actually, prior to coming <br />to this meeting, I made an attempt to do that with the hopes that maybe we could, you know, <br />negotiate that fair share thinking that would offset some of that expense. The seller is not willing <br />to do it. <br />SPRINGER:Thankyou,Mr.Correia.CommissionerGraham? <br />GRAHAMIhadonekindoffollow-upthoughtfromaplanningperspective,Ithink, <br />coming from what the Planning Director said. I remember when I was new to the Commission <br />and we were dealing with back then about time extensions, you know, when zoning had lapsed <br />and all like that and got into a discussion, you know, why do we even have the time extent -, why <br />do we even have the time requirements if were just going to keep extending it all the time. And <br />I think part of what came out of that discussion was that the idea is to avoid what I might call <br />pie-in-the-sky kind of rezonings where somebody just rezones to get some added value to the <br />land but has no particular project in mind. So it feels to me that if we go ahead and grant time <br />extensions, and kind of lock in the same conditions that happened back at the time somebody <br />starting the zoning, then were really kind of defeating that purpose of pie-in-the-sky rezonings; <br />and we might be encouraging more of that in the future. <br />CORREIA:And I can understand your position as well. If you can imagine the <br />project, I was involved with it in 92 and the developer at that time had the full intention of <br />developing the project. As a matter of fact they had a bond in place, I believe, and the bank was <br />waiting on some presales to close the construction loan. Because of the market down-turning, <br />those presales fell apart and they couldnt proceed on, you know, the groundwork construction. <br />So it was one of those things economically that just couldnt happen. <br />Now we are a different group, were coming in now to pursue this project. So I could see if the <br />original developer was before you trying to get an extension to entitle it to sell it to our group, <br />that would be one case. But we are a totally different group, so -. And I can understand your <br />position. <br />GRAHAM:Sure, yeah, thanks for that follow-up. <br />CORREIA:Thank you. <br />ANDRADE:If I could follow up with Mr. Iwashita. What this, as Commissioner or <br />Chairman Springer said and our Corporation Counsel, you know, this has to go to the County <br />Council for actual approval. And so, you know, whatever happens here, you know, we will <br />7 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.