My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021-12-21 Redistricting Commission minutes (11th Session)
PublicDocuments
>
County Clerk - Council
>
County Clerk
>
Redistricting Commission
>
2021 Redistricting Commission
>
Minutes
>
2021-12-21 Redistricting Commission minutes (11th Session)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2022 11:35:09 AM
Creation date
8/22/2022 11:05:22 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
HUSTACE: On the left. <br /> LOPEZ: You've got a hundred and . You have quite a few census blocks in there. <br /> HUSTACE: Three seventy-four (374). <br /> LOPEZ: Yeah. You have to start from the bottom up. Yeah. How does that shift? Makes <br /> it a little better. Okay, stop there. <br /> HUSTACE: So, that puts Council 7 at negative 4.07, negative 904. Council 8, negative <br /> 2.78, negative 617. <br /> LOPEZ: Okay. <br /> BATH: Commissioner Bath. What were those numbers again? Population numbers. <br /> HUSTACE: So, Council 7 is at negative 4.07. That's negative nine hundred and four <br /> (904) individuals. Council 8 is negative 2.78, negative 617. <br /> LOPEZ: I'd like to then yield at this point`cause I think the numbers are close enough. It <br /> satisfies the testimony I heard this morning and carried over from last week on the mauka <br /> portion. So, I'd like to yield and go over and allow Chair Kossow to provide input. Thank <br /> you. <br /> KOSSOW: Thank you, Mr. Lopez. Can you scroll up just a little bit? Thank you. So, this <br /> is very similar to one of my three proposals that I had. Three different ideas. There's <br /> mixed feelings, I think, in the community just in general. You know, one says the other <br /> thing, one says another. So, it's going to be—Either way we try to divvy it up, you're <br /> going to have people not be satisfied with the outcome. I do agree with Mr. Lopez's <br /> changes onto the Honok6hau. I'm a little bit worried on the Ke6pu Mauka side. But <br /> there's nothing we can really do about the makai portions. Because the census blocks <br /> runs all the way through that mauka—makai in between. As you can see, it runs through <br /> that area. And one portion is, you know, you have subdivisions and then the other portion <br /> you have nothing. So, I'm a little bit concerned about that. A little bit outside of our reach <br /> because of the census, the block irregularities. And then my other issue would be those <br /> on the southern portion of Nani Kailua. Now, I understand that three hundred and <br /> seventy-four (374)—May you scroll down there? Now, majority of these individuals <br /> belong to that subdivision on kind of the mauka portions. That's where you can kind of <br /> see those roadways in there. But there's a lot of people that's within that one street on the <br /> south side. So, if it was divvied up, I mean, it would be a lot easier to complete this task. <br /> But obviously, we have to make a hard decision here. And I think that this is perhaps the <br /> best that we can accomplish here, based off of compromise here. To that I yield. Is there <br /> any other discussions? <br /> HUSTACE: Chair. <br /> 26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.