My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-04-01 TAGTOURISM
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-04-01 TAGTOURISM
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 12:28:11 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 12:28:10 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
takemore time with it and defer it after that meeting for further discussion, then thats fine as <br />well. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you. So, Commissioners, well be hearing this one more time over <br />in Kona. Is there any further discussion on this matter today? <br />IWASHITA:Id just like to comment -. <br />SPRINGER:Sure. <br />IWASHITA:That, I guess, I understand the intent of where this is going. And I think <br />that there has to be some sensitivity to the publics interest and a local communitys interest. I <br />mean, we look at the church issue, you know, these relatively minor kinds of uses, compare it, 90 <br />people going once a week to church, right, and weve got, the reaction that we got. And youre <br />talkingabout,youknow,nowyouretalkingaboutallowingbasicallycommercialactivitydown <br />in an agricultural area, right? And so theres going to be some, at some point, I think we have to <br />be sensitive to where you draw the line. Right? And, frankly, I guess right now my gut thing is <br />40,000 is a little high. To say the least, I think it is high. And that, you know, the line has to be <br />drawn where we perceive that its, now its reasonable to have public input, give the public an <br />opportunity to address whether or not that you should be allowed. <br />SALAVEA:Madam Chairman? <br />SPRINGER:Commissioner Salavea. <br />SALAVEA:For Director Yuen, I just wanted to clarify for my own self the intent of <br />the bill is to delineate or define what would be allowed on agricultural lands in terms of Ag <br />Tourism. Is that correct? <br />YUEN:Thats right. To allow, to define a certain level that we allow without <br />having to go to a special permit that comes to the Planning Commission. <br />SALAVEA:Thank you. <br />SIRACUSA:I was wondering if we want to look at the issue in terms of, well, if its <br />agricultural land and the primary source of funds for the farmer should be from actual farming, <br />do we want to then say that any monies that come in from Ag Tourism should be less than that so <br />that we have a, we know that the maxi -? Excuse me. <br />WATANABE:May I? I believe the proposed bill indicates that no more than 50 percent <br />of the gross revenue can come from peripheral sales. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you, Commissioner Watanabe. And, also, on page 2, theres that <br />discussion of a value that is commensurate with the land area and type of crop produced from the <br />Farm Bureau. Any other discussion? Okay. So, Mr. Yuen, well hear this again Kona. <br />6 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.