My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-04-01 TWAILANI
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2010
>
2010-04-01 TWAILANI
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 12:30:23 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 12:30:21 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
This is an aerial photo of the site. You can see that the properties are undeveloped. You’ll also <br />get an idea of the other vacant areas in the mauka direction and to the south, and then the existing <br />subdivisions. <br />The applicant is requesting a Project District consisting of approximately 518 residential units, <br />which will include about 333 senior housing units, 90 multiple family town house units, and 95 <br />single family residential lots. They’re also proposing 180,000 square feet of a medical office <br />campus, 200,000 square feet of a commercial center, and a 100,000-square foot business park, as <br />well as approximately 26 acres of active and passive recreational and open space areas. They’re <br />also proposing infrastructure improvements which would include the extension of Ponahawai <br />Street from Komohana Street up to the Mohouli Street Extension, and that extension <br />improvement you can see here. This is Komohana Street on the right side of the slide. The <br />extension would run through the project site and connect up to Mohouli Avenue. This slide <br />shows the first phase of the proposed development. You can see the medical office campus <br />that’s shown in blue and it’s located mauka of Komohana Street, across from the Puuhonu <br />Medical facilities that are on the makai side of Komohana Street. Also, the commercial center, <br />they’re proposing to develop 100,000 square feet of the commercial center in the first phase, as <br />well as preserve the Puuhonu Cinder Cone as a passive open recreational area and a park, an <br />active park facility in this area. <br />The second phase of development would build on that. It would include 80,000 square feet of <br />the medical office campus which would complete that development. And then another 100,000 <br />square feet of commercial development which would complete the commercial center, as well as <br />the 333 or so elderly housing units. The town house units are shown here in orange and would <br />get access off of a cul-de-sac from Mohouli Avenue. <br />And then the third phase of development would, again, build on the other two and include single <br />family residential lots on the north side of the project on the Mohouli Avenue end, as well as the <br />business park that’s shown here along the Alenaio Drainage Channel; and that’s shown in red, <br />and then some large lot residential development south of the cul-de-sac off Mohouli Avenue. <br />The Department is recommending that the Commission send a favorable recommendation to the <br />County Council for this application. <br />WOODWARD: Thank you, Maija. Do we have any questions from Commissioners for the <br />staff? Commissioner Domingo. <br />DOMINGO: I see that this particular application would replace that of the University Terrace. <br />COTTLE: That’s correct. <br />DOMINGO: Are the proposed, are the owners and the proposed developers the same people that <br />we’re looking at? <br />COTTLE: No. The ownership has changed. The previous University Terrace Project District <br />was applied for by Western United; and they, I believe that company went bankrupt. And the <br />new owners took ownership of the property a few years ago. <br />DOMINGO: I see. One of my concerns in the past is when individuals or developers obtain the <br />necessary permits for development, and then after a short while without even meeting the <br />conditions of approval they would spin out the property and take advantage of that and reap, you <br />know, financial benefits. And I’m concerned that if people do that from time to time then that <br />drives up the cost of property without anything being built upon. And that impacts on <br />2 <br /> EXHIBIT C <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.