My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003-04-04 tdusel3
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003
>
2003-04-04 tdusel3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 12:33:03 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 12:32:58 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
FUKE:Yes. Mr. Chairman and Members of the Commission, I have ju <br />received a call this morning from the applicant, Mr. Dusel, who had like another <br />emergency so he couldn't make it. But notwithstanding his absen <br />to also review the Staff's report and the Director's proposed recommendations, and he <br />found them to be very thorough and acceptable. <br />Oh, he's here. This is Mr. Dusel. You want to identify yoursel <br />DUSEL:Yeah, I'm James Dusel and the applicant. <br />NOMURA:Please use the microphone. <br />GALDONES:Could you speak into the mike so you could be recorded, <br />DUSEL:Oh, I'm sorry. James Dusel, applicant for the rezoning. <br />GALDONES:Mr. Dusel, will you be providing any testimony? If you will -. <br />No, why don't I just swear you in, sir, so that in case you do provide any testimony -. <br />Could you please raise your right hand. <br />DUSEL:Sure. <br />GALDONES:Do you swear or affirm to tell the truth on this matter <br />the Hawai'i County Planning Commission? <br />DUSEL:I do. <br />GALDONES:Thank you. Mr. Fuke. <br />FUKE:Yes. To kind of like follow up on some of the dialog betwe <br />Commissioners and the Director and the Staff, first of all, in terms of the water system, it <br />is true Mr. Dusel and the current property owner, they already have an approved water <br />system. That is to say the Department of Water Supply approved the water system, you <br />know, to service the two dwellings on the property. And relatedly, the condition that I <br />think the Director is suggesting by limiting the number of dwellings I think has a lot of <br />merit and it's on point. Largely, because if you approve, you know, the applicant is <br />representing that they want a two-lot subdivision, they're going to put up one house on <br />each of the proposed lots; and on that basis, you know, we got approval from the <br />Department of Water Supply in terms of how you're going to service this system. If you <br />don't have a home restriction, what happens is that five or ten years down the road, under <br />the farm dwelling provision, each of the respective lots could, conceivably, the lot owners <br />could apply for like a farm dwelling. And you might have like two or three dwellings on <br />each of the properties, and then you strain the infrastructure. So what the Director is <br />proposing is that saying you get what you ask for, only two dwellings on each lot. And <br />until the system is upgraded, vis-à-vis, going through the zone change process, alerting <br />12 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.