2003-04-04 tdusel3 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Condition No. H, the Planning Department has, I think it's Planning, has been sending up this condition about a roadway widening and it contains the word in the last sentence sgdqd+n`srtbgshld`rl`ybe demanded by the Deo`qsldmsneOtakhbVnqjr-oVgdm these come forward, Hludaddmbg`mfhmfsg`ssnnqdptdrssg`s-oHsghmjncdl`mcdco sounds a little too strong; and I would ask the Department please not to use that word anymore. I think, you know, we serve the public and we should not use that kind of vnqc-@esdq`kk+sgdxlqdfhuhmfsgdoqnodqsx-Vdlqdqdpthqhmfsgdlsnfhudhssntr+rn sg`slritrs`lhmnqonhms- YUEN:WeÓll change the word to ÐrequiredÑ in the future. TYLER:Yeah, Ðrequired,Ñ or Ðrequested,Ñ or whatever. Now, IÓm puzzled about the, well, I thank the Director for suggesting the restrictive covenants in Condition G. I think those are excellent and absolutely necessary to prevent any abuse. But IÓm uncertain as to how theyÓre going to proceed if they donÓt proceed with a subdivision. It seems to indicate that if they donÓt subdivide it, they donÓt have to put in the water. If they donÓt subdivide it, how are they going to put in, how is this deal going to go through? ItÓs predicated on Mr. Dusel purchasing the property; and he canÓt purchase it if itÓs not subdivided. So why is this language in there? ItÓs sort of like, well, you know, if they donÓt subdivide it, they donÓt have to do these things, like maybe thatÓs what theyÓre going to do. But I thought this was, the purpose of the rezoning is to allow a subdivision of at least one lot; and itÓs only that lot. I believe, Mr. Chairman, itÓs not, it only applies to that one lot. The other 20 acres is going to remain in Ag-20. Is that correct? The whole thing would go to RA-3? GALDONES:Daryn will now address it. ARAI:The proposal, the entire property is currently zoned Ag-20, 21.7 acres. The request is to rezone a portion to FA 3-acres and the balance to be Ag-10. So the Ag-10 would, for the remaining 18.7 acres, would prevent its further subdivision into additional lots and Ag-3 is to accommodate the 3-acre portion that the applicant wishes to carve out. TYLER:Okay, so the maximum number of lots, if you come out of th the maximum number of dwellings would be two. ARAI:Two. And I should add that the condition regarding the second dwelling restriction applies to both properties, the 18.7 balance and the 3 acres. TYLER:Yes. Thank you, Mr. Arai. Appreciate that. So IÓm puzzled as to why there would not be a subdivision. ÒCause thereÓs some language in here that seems to indicate that if they donÓt subdivide it, they donÓt have to do this. 19