Laserfiche WebLink
And what I'm saying is that the chances are very good that the variance would be granted <br />to give some relief to the landowner in that situation. And so that's where the end result, <br />that's where this would end up. <br />Now what we're doing here is saying that given the relatively limited scope of this <br />application, that we would support the rezoning with that same, without putting the <br />condition that Water Supply wants in the rezoning. So they would then be able to go in <br />and have the zoning and then apply for the water; and then, and at the point of <br />subdivision, they apply for this variance from this water system standard. <br />GALDONES:Commissioner Kubota. <br />KUBOTA:Mr. Chair, if I understand Director clearly, then that means you are <br />pre-empting the variance application by proposing what you're proposing from the <br />Department? <br />YUEN:We're not -, they would still have to apply for the variance. <br />KUBOTA:But at this point -. <br />YUEN:At the time -. <br />KUBOTA:You're pre-empting it. You're not -. <br />YUEN:We're not pre-empting it. <br />KUBOTA:You're not pre-empting it? <br />YUEN:Yeah. In -, if the language, if the condition had been put in per the <br />Department of Water Supply letter as a condition of the rezoning, you -, that would be, <br />that would, I think, pre-empt applying for the variance at a future time, yeah. <br />GALDONES:Daryn, was there more to your presentation? <br />ARAI:I'll make it short. I don't want to get into more trouble. <br />KUBOTA:You're not getting into trouble, just clarifying things for me. <br />ARAI:Yeah, no, I know. I'm just joking. <br />KUBOTA:I'm sorry if my looks betray you and I throw you off. I' <br />ARAI:No, no. Just to clarify, there have been additional inform <br />have been submitted by the applicant, and copies of these docume <br />distributed to you. First of all is a copy of a letter dated February 4, 2002. Basically, it's <br />4 <br /> <br />