Laserfiche WebLink
decided thereupon that it will be that way, then they could go ahead and go through the plan <br />approval process. But they didn’t have the time; so I think that’s the reason why they’re coming <br />before us and asking for an extension of that time to fulfill that requirement. And I think we <br />must bear in mind that it’s something that they had no control; and, in fact, the County, it was in <br />the County’s hands at that time. <br />WATANABE: I think Mr. Rho has conceded that though. So I -. <br />DOMINGO: I think some of the improvements as stated in the original ordinance have <br />been already done by the County, Mr. Yuen? <br />YUEN: Well, the Mohouli-Komohana signals the County installed. <br />DOMINGO: Yeah, it’s there already. <br />YUEN: The Kukuau-Komohana signals were not installed. <br />DOMINGO: Okay. <br />WATANABE: Okay. Ms. Siracusa. <br />SIRACUSA: Back to Commissioner Rho’s concerns, since the part here under <br />Condition E that talks about the $175,000 is underscored and was not mentioned in the deleted <br />part of that condition, it would appear that that’s a new figure that has come before us. And I’m <br />wondering if that was something that Public Works, for example, had informed the Planning <br />Department of what the avoided cost would be today or what the cost would have been back <br />then. <br />WATANABE: It’s my understanding and Mr. Yuen can correct me if I’m wrong, but it’s <br />my understanding that it was recorded or documented back in 1995. <br />SIRACUSA: Cause I don’t see it here. <br />WATANABE: I understand. May I continue, back in ’95 in a separate document for the <br />subdivision approval. So all they’re doing is incorporating that into this cause they said, in <br />Mr. Yuen’s mind, it’s one agreement, the ordinance as well as the subdivision approval. And so <br />what has happened is they said we no longer need a stop light there because they’re not having <br />access there but we’re not willing to remove the $175,000 and the $60,000. I might point out <br />that we do regularly make adjustments to pricing, especially when it comes to affordable housing <br />requirements; and this would be, I believe, under Condition I. I believe that’s all new, yeah, <br />updated amounts? Mr. Yuen? <br />YUEN: The fair share has been updated amounts, yes. And the affordable housing <br />condition has changed to be the standard current language. <br />SIRACUSA: Okay. <br /> EXHIBIT B 6 <br /> <br /> <br />