Laserfiche WebLink
driveway; and then we can do the inspection sometime fairly close to the end of the six-month <br />period of time and make sure that, in fact, it’s not a junkyard. <br />WATANABE: Ms. Ogata. <br />OGATA: Actually I think that we should probably have an inspector go out soon <br />and then another one afterwards, because we do need to document if there are any current <br />violations. And if we’re going to take the testifier’s information as a possible complaint then <br />wouldn’t an inspector need to go out like right away, and then again as Commissioner <br />Woodward suggested towards the end of the timeframe, so that we can see the progress or if <br />there’s continued noncompliance? <br />WOODWARD: That would be fine with me. <br />SIRACUSA: I agree. <br />WATANABE: Mr. Yuen, so say within 30 days, cause you did indicate 30 days, maybe <br />we do an inspection? <br />YUEN: Yes, and if the Commission would like we can arrange to have an <br />inspector go out say within a month of the six-month time deadline to verify that everything is <br />okay on the ground. If everything is okay, I would not schedule this. You know, I would only <br />bring it to the Commission if something was wrong, let’s put it that way. And I would like us, <br />you know, we have spent a lot of time on this; and I would like to see if the Commission can <br />achieve a consensus so that we don’t have to continue this on the agenda. And so, you know, I <br />do think certainly that we can have somebody, an inspector, go out to the property and take a <br />look within the next month and again in about five months. <br />SIRACUSA: I have a procedural question. <br />WATANABE: Yes, Ms. Siracusa. <br />SIRACUSA: If we were to make that same motion again but shortening it from one <br />year to six months and including within 30 days an inspection by the Planning Department’s <br />inspector, could we make that approval contingent upon a determination that it is not a junkyard? <br />So that if the inspector comes along within a month’s time and says yes this is a junkyard then <br />the condition would become null and void, I mean the approval to extend the condition would <br />become null and void? Is that possible procedurally? Should I be asking Ivan that? I think he’s <br />leafing through -. <br />WATANABE: I see, while the Director is mulling an answer, let me -. <br />WOODWARD: Mr. Chairman, while everybody is mulling, I might make a comment. I <br />think the reason for having an inspection in a month is a baseline. <br />SIRACUSA: Yes. <br /> EXHIBIT A 27 <br /> <br /> <br />