My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
08-29-2022 MINUTES OF APPLICANT'S MEETING WITH RESIDENTS
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
*Background/Recommendation Reports (June 2020-Sept 2022)
>
2022
>
2022-09-01 Windward
>
Item #1 Renegade Towers, LLC (PL-USE-2022-000004)
>
08-29-2022 MINUTES OF APPLICANT'S MEETING WITH RESIDENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/31/2022 11:50:56 AM
Creation date
8/31/2022 11:50:22 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Q &A Regarding Exposures from Cellular Antennas <br /> Can you explain the emissions from cellular antennas in How do our standards compare to other countries? <br /> simple terms? <br /> Approximately 60 countries use the guidelines developed by the <br /> The radiofrequency (RF)waves given off by the antennas used International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation <br /> are the same as those used by FM radio and TV. The RF Protection (ICNIRP). ICNIRP recently reaffirmed their <br /> energy is non ionizing and is fundamentally different than guidelines,which are almost identical to the U.S.limits,in 2009. <br /> ionizing radiation associated with X-ray machines, CAT scans Approximately 14 countries have standards that are lower than <br /> and nuclear power. In fact, the RF energy used in cellular the ICNIRP/IEEE standard. These lower standards are not <br /> communication is at least 1 million times too low to directly health based standards but based on the concept of prudent <br /> break chemical bonds or disrupt macromolecules such as DNA. avoidance. <br /> With few exceptions,the only confirmed hazards of RF energy <br /> are associated with excessive heating of tissue. What are typical exposure levels from wireless antennas <br /> What are the allowable exposure limits and who sets the and how do they compare to other sources? <br /> standard? Let's create some common terminology first. The most <br /> common cellular sites are called macro sites and can range in <br /> The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) adopted height from approximately 50'to 150'. Small cell cells are used <br /> Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits in 1996 for in downtown areas or neighborhoods to infill coverage around <br /> transmitters operating at frequencies used by wireless macro sites and those range in height from as low as 10'to 30' <br /> communication. These limits are based on recommendations in height. There are also Distributed Area Systems (DAS)but <br /> made by the National Council on Radiation Protection and in terms of exposure they are essentially the same as small cell <br /> Measurements (NCRP) in 1986 and by the Institute for systems. <br /> Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) and adopted <br /> by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI). The Macro sites and small cell site are comparable to each other in <br /> FCC adopted the RF exposure limits consultation with the terms of exposure with maximum exposures being a few <br /> EPA, FDA, OSI IA and NIOSI I. These limits are based on percent of the standard whereas a typical exposure would be <br /> known biological effects and are primarily related to tissue less than 1%of the limit. <br /> heating. <br /> Andrew H.Thatcher,MSHP,CHP 1 <br /> www.rfthatcher.com <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.