Laserfiche WebLink
Q &A Regarding Exposures from Cellular Antennas <br /> Can you explain the emissions from cellular antennas in How do our standards compare to other countries? <br /> simple terms? <br /> Approximately 60 countries use the guidelines developed by the <br /> The radiofrequency (RF)waves given off by the antennas used International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation <br /> are the same as those used by FM radio and TV. The RF Protection (ICNIRP). ICNIRP recently reaffirmed their <br /> energy is non ionizing and is fundamentally different than guidelines,which are almost identical to the U.S.limits,in 2009. <br /> ionizing radiation associated with X-ray machines, CAT scans Approximately 14 countries have standards that are lower than <br /> and nuclear power. In fact, the RF energy used in cellular the ICNIRP/IEEE standard. These lower standards are not <br /> communication is at least 1 million times too low to directly health based standards but based on the concept of prudent <br /> break chemical bonds or disrupt macromolecules such as DNA. avoidance. <br /> With few exceptions,the only confirmed hazards of RF energy <br /> are associated with excessive heating of tissue. What are typical exposure levels from wireless antennas <br /> What are the allowable exposure limits and who sets the and how do they compare to other sources? <br /> standard? Let's create some common terminology first. The most <br /> common cellular sites are called macro sites and can range in <br /> The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) adopted height from approximately 50'to 150'. Small cell cells are used <br /> Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits in 1996 for in downtown areas or neighborhoods to infill coverage around <br /> transmitters operating at frequencies used by wireless macro sites and those range in height from as low as 10'to 30' <br /> communication. These limits are based on recommendations in height. There are also Distributed Area Systems (DAS)but <br /> made by the National Council on Radiation Protection and in terms of exposure they are essentially the same as small cell <br /> Measurements (NCRP) in 1986 and by the Institute for systems. <br /> Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) and adopted <br /> by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI). The Macro sites and small cell site are comparable to each other in <br /> FCC adopted the RF exposure limits consultation with the terms of exposure with maximum exposures being a few <br /> EPA, FDA, OSI IA and NIOSI I. These limits are based on percent of the standard whereas a typical exposure would be <br /> known biological effects and are primarily related to tissue less than 1%of the limit. <br /> heating. <br /> Andrew H.Thatcher,MSHP,CHP 1 <br /> www.rfthatcher.com <br />