Laserfiche WebLink
hollow tile going up a few feet high and then going up higher as you, depending on the <br />topography of the land, and on that is made wooden slats of some sort with the wind being able <br />to pass through, but certainly not animals, and hopefully it would create a barrier for carbon <br />dioxide going through as they indicated. You know, that’s what I’m looking at. <br />SONG: Mr. Domingo, if they wanted a fence my clients could put up a fence. I <br />think some of the complaints, and some of these complaints are mixed up because it has gone <br />over a series of years. This lot was previously, until about a year and a half ago this lot was not <br />fenced. It was open. And primarily it was not used by employees. It was really used by HCC; <br />and it was either used by the jail guards or people coming to visit. In fact, there was a letter in <br />the file where Ms. Reis complained because she found dirty diapers. This is all before the <br />building tried to fence it off and control the area. And so when it was just a vacant lot, I mean, I <br />hate to say it but people going to HCC are not always the nicest people; and that’s across the <br />street. And if it’s going to be open and vacant, they’re going to, you know, they’re going to use <br />it, or do whatever. So merely by the fact that it’s fenced off now has stopped that problem. As <br />far as animals jumping a fence and getting into other people’s property, well, if they’re jumping <br />a fence I don’t what can be done about that. But, again, my clients are willing to do what’s <br />necessary to keep that parking lot from access to the neighbors, to protect the neighbors from <br />dogs, or people, or whatever. <br />GRAHAM: Okay. Commissioner Watanabe? <br />WATANABE: Yeah, I have a question for the Director; and I’m referring to this comment <br />letter dated February 27, 2007 from Public Works. And they had indicated, you know, at that <br />time they weren’t sure whether entry would be from Punahele Street or not and they had <br />indicated that, you know, they should provide for road widening, future road widening because <br />it’s a 40-foot roadway currently. And I’m wondering if we already have the right-of-way to do <br />the widening. I’m not suggesting that we should do the widening now cause you’ve eliminated <br />access from Punahele. But I’m just hoping that we already do have the right-of-way or if we <br />don’t that we would be able to obtain it at no cost to the County should the County then in the <br />future decide they want to do a road widening there. We already have that. I believe it’s not <br />going to affect their parking lot because it’d probably be, the road widening would probably be <br />in any required setbacks or what not, you know. <br />GRAHAM: That’s a question for Mr. Yuen? <br />WATANABE: Yes. <br />YUEN: We didn’t include the improvements to Punahele Street because of the <br />limited nature of the project and the fact that there wasn’t going to be any access to it. We could <br />have a road widening setback condition put in, and that would be a normal condition in the <br />rezoning. Jeff, was there a reason why we didn’t have a road widening setback? <br />DARROW: Just because of the fact that there hasn’t been any other setbacks on that <br />stretch. <br />YUEN: So that this would be the only one. <br /> EXHIBIT C <br />17 <br /> <br />