My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007-04-05 TAOAO
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2007
>
2007-04-05 TAOAO
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 12:36:21 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 12:36:16 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
But as far as the planting screen, it was my understanding we would have started doing a <br />planting screen along the Reis and Gushiken properties. In fact, part of the agreement was that <br />we were supposed to meet with them so they would have input on that. Unfortunately what <br />happened is we closed the parking lot on that date and then Ms. Reis sent a letter that very same <br />day saying she didn’t want to participate in any agreement and settlement. So we never got any <br />input from them as to what they wanted as far as the planting screen easement and we didn’t <br />proceed with it. I thought we’d have one by now but we just didn’t want to do anything without <br />community input as well. Cause right now there are podocarpus trees between Parcel 42 and the <br />back side of these residents’ parcels. And podocarpus trees provide a great buffer but they also, <br />the roots are terrible and the roots have caused problems. And then they’ve had termite <br />problems with some of the podocarpuses, so they’ve had to treat the podocarpuses for termites. <br />So podocarpuses in hindsight hasn’t been the best choice. But they want to put something there <br />that would provide a good buffer other than the podocarpuses. So, you know, there have been <br />some challenges with the landscaping there. And also, Ms. Siracusa, part of why we drafted the <br />application the way we did is if it would be more satisfactory to put up a solid fence for the <br />neighbors, that’s not a problem either if that would satisfy the community more than the <br />landscaping. <br />GRAHAM: Okay, thank you. <br />SIRACUSA: Follow-up? <br />GRAHAM: Follow-up. <br />SIRACUSA: It’s my understanding that the primary concern of the neighbors is not so <br />much the visual impact of having to look through a chain–link fence at all the cars but the fact <br />that it’s the noise and the fumes, especially when they start up their cars again. And certainly a <br />very thick planting would help that, but a solid fence would help that as well. My main concern, <br />and I’ve mentioned this earlier, and Diane referred to it, was that I really feel that we should not <br />allow the parking lot to be reopened until there’s a good solid buffer of one sort or another -- be <br />it solid or whatever, you know, is determined, that’s not my call -- in order to protect those two <br />neighboring parcels. <br />VAN DE CAR: I think the applicant would be willing to put a fence up right away. <br />Landscaping you’d have to wait until the landscaping grew up. But I think they’d be willing to <br />put up a fence right away which might accomplish that goal. <br />GRAHAM: All right, thank you. Commissioner Watanabe? <br />WATANABE: Earlier I asked the Director if we had any future road widening setbacks <br />included. And I’d like to ask the applicant now if you think that might be something you’d be <br />agreeable to if we were to craft something like that. <br />SONG: I talked to Dr. Takase and he said it would be okay. <br />WATANABE: Okay, thank you. <br />GRAHAM: Any other questions? Commissioner Iwashita? <br /> EXHIBIT C <br />19 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.