My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007-04-05 TMIRANDA
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2007
>
2007-04-05 TMIRANDA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 12:36:30 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 12:36:27 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
GRAHAM: I think Mr. Yuen can extend it administratively for one year; and we can <br />extend it if we wish but we need to have it agendized, what we’re doing.And that’s what he was <br />referring to till today, was no extension on the agenda for us. So it’s only available for him to <br />extend that one year. <br />WOODWARD: Okay. And then I just wanted to make a comment to Mr. Miranda. And I <br />think that is if Mr. Yuen had not been willing to extend this to you, this compromise, that the <br />Commission likely would have voted to revoke your permit. And I think if things are not taken <br />care of in the timeframe that’s provided to you, it will be a slam dunk next time it comes before <br />us. <br />GRAHAM: All right, thank you. Commissioner Iwashita? <br />IWASHITA: Thank you, Mr. Chair. Given what the Director suggested earlier -- that is <br />part of the suggestion being that he anticipates if there is compliance within, if there is <br />compliance, then he would just be submitting a report and would withdraw the request -- I think <br />that the motion with the reference to being deferred to August as a specific time frame, that the <br />August time frame should be removed and basically be deferred without a time reference. And if <br />the Director, so that leaves it up to the Director if there is nothing worked out and he wants to <br />continue to seek revocation then it can be reagendized, the present revocation request can be <br />reagendized. And if there is compliance, then all he needs to do is provide a report. If we leave <br />the date in, the cutoff date, basically that requires that this matter be reagendized for September <br />after the expiration of the period, and I don’t think that’s the intent. <br />GRAHAM: Mr. Watanabe, is that your intent with the motion that there be sort of a <br />date where action comes forward from August, like to us to either revoke or a report from the -? <br />WATANABE: No. And I take that as a friendly amendment. <br />GRAHAM: Okay, fine. We could do, go with a vote on this motion then. <br />WATANABE: You want to have Mr. Domingo second that friendly amendment? <br />GRAHAM: Mr. Domingo, would you second that clarification or amendment? <br />DOMINGO: I will, I will. <br />GRAHAM: All right. Commissioner Siracusa? <br />SIRACUSA: Yes. I was one of the people who originally supported Mr. Miranda’s <br />special permit as being a bonafide agricultural related use of the property. And at a previous <br />meeting, Mr. Rodrigues said he felt that the Planning Commission had not bent over backwards <br />to support Mr. Miranda. And I just want to say that I don’t think our job description includes <br />contortionism. I would have been prepared, like Mr. Woodward, Commissioner Woodward, to <br />vote against this, support the revocation. But considering that the Planning Director is willing to <br />reconsider based on a new set of recommendations, including the old recommendations, I will be <br />voting in support of this motion. <br /> EXHIBIT A <br />18 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.