My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007-04-05 THICDC
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2007
>
2007-04-05 THICDC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 12:36:45 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 12:36:39 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Highway, and that the only public access to that is an old one-lane bridge. Now at the beginning <br />of this presentation the gentleman at the podium was talking about the access. I hope that it was <br />noticed when it was brought up that one of those accesses is not public. It’s a private road. It <br />actually is part of the parcel which saddles that road on both sides. It belongs to, it is owned by <br />Richard Ha and it is part of his parcel. It is not a public road. This brings up problems with <br />liability in case we would have an accident or death on that road. It brings up problems of <br />upkeep. Is the County going to keep up a private road? Is the State going to maintain that <br />private road? And in the absence of these, the only access to this development is a one-lane <br />bridge on a very narrow road. This is my first concern. <br />My second has to do, as has already been stated, with public health. This proposal is for a dense <br />aggregate of open sewage of septic tanks which have been used for generations here. Now the <br />problem in this particular parcel is that the water doesn’t always stay underground. Those of you <br />that are familiar with septic tanks know that the basic idea is that the waste leaches out the side <br />of the tank and down into the ground. And as long as these are spread far enough apart so <br />there’s plenty of leach area for this effluent to be absorbed into and detoxified everything is fine. <br />The Health Department by their regulations has said that the minimum they would recommend is <br />10,000 foot lots for this; and yet this particular development is down to 7,500. <br />The reason I mentioned that I’m right across the street is that I am intimately familiar with this <br />piece of property. I’ve lived there for just short of a quarter century. This is my neighbor. We <br />have watched that property fill up with water time and time and time again. An open septic <br />system works well, except in one situation; and in that situation it should never be used. And <br />that’s when the water level will rise up to the surface. Because in that situation the effluent is no <br />longer being taken down into the ground. It’s being washed to the surface. I fear that that’s <br />what’s going to happen on this piece of property if we put dense open sewage systems in a place <br />where the water level comes up, not down. Okay? <br />My neighbor has a basement. As rare as hen’s teeth in Hawaii, okay. Not much of a basement, <br />just small room, cinder block. It’s dug into the ground, it has got a slab floor and a cinderblock <br />wall. When you stand in it your eyes are just about the level of the ground. Every time we have <br />a large storm that room fills up with water. And it doesn’t fill up from the top. It fills up from <br />the bottom. It’s not water running along the surface and flowing into it. It’s the water literally <br />running through the ground and bringing the water table up. Now in his situation in his cement <br />room, the only thing that happens is a few tools fall down and some, some spare pieces of wood <br />float to the surface. If that room were a septic system, that’s not what would be floating to the <br />surface. <br />Now we’re talking about a development that is supposed to be for the benefit of the low income <br />housing. There is a need for that on this island, a very desperate need; and I’m sure that all you <br />gentlemen being connected with the local government have received numerous notices about <br />how important this must be. That does not mean that every proposal that has to do with low <br />income housing is necessarily good. And I think low income housing is a very vital, very <br />important problem that needs to be addressed. My difficulty with it is this particular piece of <br />land and whether it is suitable for such a development. If I was someone who couldn’t afford a <br />house, but who was able to get one of these pieces of property, was able to build through my <br />own sweat equity, to build a home finally for my family, a little piece of the aina that is now <br /> EXHIBIT D <br />21 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.