My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-04-07 Tgp-amendment
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-04-07 Tgp-amendment
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 12:39:08 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 12:39:03 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
GRAHAM:I think I understand your concern, Dr. Bergin, about the impact on farmers <br />and all. But given what Ms. Wille has said and with the way I read whats in the General Plan, <br />somehow it feels like your concern is greater than what it would seem to me to be called for by <br />the words I see here. So let me just flesh that out and hear what you think. The words say to <br />relieve traffic congestion, implement construction of, and then theres an A and a B. And A is <br />the Parker Ranch Road that runs from Kamamalu Street to Mamalahoa Highway, which is not <br />the part youre concerned with. And then B is the Countys extension of this road between <br />Mamalahoa Highway and Kawaihae Road in the vicinity of the Waimea Solid Waste Transfer <br />Station. So it seems like what its saying is it is the direction of the County and the plan of the <br />County to make that connector road across that section. And obviously Lalamilo Farmlots are in <br />that area where the connector is going to be, but it has not given any specific location or it has <br />not given any specific plans on how it will be built or not be built. So my sense is if the road is <br />really needed, which I think we all agree it really is, that there does need to be a good bypass <br />road. The specific issues will get worked out, not at the General Plan level but before anybody <br />startsdiggingandbulldozingandthingslikethat.Sounlessitscleartoyouthattheresnoway <br />it can get worked out, it seems to me that its good to leave it in there cause its a real need, and <br />this is a way to address that need. So do you feel real clear that theres just no hope for making <br />this section of the bypass without doing bad damage to the Lalamilo Farmlots? <br />BERGIN:Some information that might help you understand the gravity of the <br />th <br />situation is that if I include it today this is probably the 12 meeting that Ive been to with some <br />form of regulatory or government agency. And most repeatedly in those presentations that are <br />given in regard to the pathway of a connector road, Lalamilo to Kawaihae, theres Plan A and <br />Plan B. Plan A would be attempt to utilize the restricted by State covenant an 80-foot pathway, a <br />paper road going down there. That would be to the immediate east, immediately windward, of <br />all of these farm lots that parallel that boundary. <br />GRAHAM:So this is an alternative way to deal with traffic thats not whats talked <br />about in the plan, is that what youre saying? <br />BERGIN:Itisadescription,ifyouletmefinish,itsadescriptionoftwoproposed <br />routes of the connector road. And for the sake of clarity, lets not use the term bypass because <br />thatswelloutoftownandnotimmediatelyanattempt,Ithinkaverynobleattempt,totryand <br />get traffic through Waimea. So as I was beginning to say Connector Road A would parallel the <br />eastern border, boundary of 7, or 8, or 9 lots. Okay? Connector Road B would utilize the <br />existing Lalamilo Farmlot Road, which is a farm road that carries a lot of very slow tractor <br />traffic. Many of the tractors are pulling large booms that are used to extend the arm of pesticide <br />sprayers or fertilization. Theres horse traffic on that road. It would be, I think, a huge setback <br />for the farming community to put it there. The risk exists even with Connector Road A, if you <br />carefully read the Food Safety Act. And their imposition of what they describe as a buffer is a <br />deep buffer; and that, again, would probably cause the reduction of that degree, that depth of <br />farming within that area to comply with Federal law. So the reaction of the farming community <br />has an awful lot to do with the imposition of the Food Safety Act, to be in compliance of that. <br />This is predominantly a leafy vegetable community. Many of those products go directly from <br />the farm after being processed only by washing, and not cooking and heating into the mouths of <br />our community. And thats the nature of the Food Safety Act, is to go ahead and protect those <br />types of foods that dont go through any process that would sterilize it or at least minimally <br />reduce the contamination. So I think the general community of farmers are really trying to <br />10EXHIBIT C <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.