My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-04-07 Tgp-amendment
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-04-07 Tgp-amendment
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 12:39:08 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 12:39:03 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
IWASHITA:Dr. Bergin, did you go to any of the same meetings that Ms. Wille talked <br />about where the Route D was discussed? <br />BERGIN:Yes. <br />IWASHITA:So is Route D, would that be in your experience, meet the Federal <br />guidelines? <br />BERGIN:We should give credit to a fellow named David Gomes who came up with <br />that and he had a list of 8 or 9 different reliefs that Schedule D would create; and I think thats a <br />very logical document. Where the community of Lalamilo Farmlots Association drew concern <br />was that at the very tail end of it where it would begin to approach what we called the Waimea <br />Transfer Station area, it intersects one Lot 27, a very productive intensive lettuce farm. And to <br />thatdegree,wantingtobepureinourdefinitionofprotectingagriculture,itwassmarterthatwe <br />not necessarily take a position. Now, now with that said though, that if that tail end, the last few <br />hundred yards of that leg which does provide relief could be moved in an easterly direction, <br />north and easterly direction, that would certainly be something that I think, provided it falls <br />within the buffer zones allowable by the Food Safety Act, I think that could be a digestible <br />resolution. There is also too a former military road that goes even further east that goes right <br />through Parker Ranchs Puu Opelo, and I think that was C. So many ideas have come forth, but <br />some of them are more viable than others. <br />IWASHITA:Well, thank you for coming and expressing your very important views. <br />And it really sounds to me like we ought to be able to come out with some protective language <br />so that your concerns can be addressed and still maintain, make it clear that this connector road <br />should, is going to be done. <br />ALAMEDA:Thank you. Thank you, Commissioner Iwashita. Commissioner Siracusa. <br />SIRACUSA:Yes. Do the guidelines for the Food Safety Act get into any details <br />specifying how wide a buffer zone should be, or (inaudible), or what type of materials should <br />be used in a buffer zone? <br />BERGIN:Yes. <br />SIRACUSA:Could you give us a little information about that, please. <br />BERGIN:I have to go purely by memory so I stand to be correct. Some of them <br />were at a minimum 300 feet, some of them were 300 yards. So depending on the nature of the <br />farming operation with wind density, with wind in particular, particulate matter taken under <br />consideration, that would quantify and define what the buffer zone would be. But they were <br />greater than I had imagined it would be. <br />SIRACUSA:Thank you. And I imagine it would also vary whether it was a dirt road or <br />a paved road, because with a dirt road you would get the additional problem particulates. <br />BERGIN:Correct. <br />12EXHIBIT C <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.