My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-04-07 Tgp-amendment
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-04-07 Tgp-amendment
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 12:39:08 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 12:39:03 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ALAMEDA:Thank you. <br />BERGIN:You can see that I did attach several items. I think there are probably <br />about 12 or 15 of them that really are input items that came from different members of the <br />community over the last year where different ideas came from community members, the small <br />changes, like a left-turn pocket here and there. A right-turn lane, an extended right lane, would <br />hugely gain the ability to flow traffic through Waimea. Thank you. <br />ALAMEDA:Thank you. Thank you, Dr. Bergin. Questions for our testifier? <br />Commissioner Siracusa? <br />SIRACUSA:Well, its not exactly a question. I just wanted to comment that so often <br />people come before us and they say do this, you know, we agree with this, or dont do that, and <br />yet they will not come up with a proactive alternative suggestion for us. And you have done <br />quiteafewhere;andIwanttothankyouforthatbecauseitopensupthepossiblealternatives <br />that can be considered. Whether they will be implemented or not, its not for me to say. But at <br />least it puts more ideas on the table. So thank you for that. <br />BERGIN:Thank you for your observation. <br />ALAMEDA:Also, Fellow Commissioners, you know, Im thinking too as Im making <br />my notes here for questions that I would want to actually present them to the Director when he <br />gets back up. In my own mind Im thinking thats the best route to go, rather than to go from the <br />testifier to the Director, back to the testifier again, but I dont know -. Commissioner Graham, <br />whats your thoughts on that, or -? <br />GRAHAM:I had a comment to make to the testifier but I want to understand your <br />procedural thing. Your procedural feeling is like maybe we should let the Director respond and <br />then afterwards we come with our questions, is that what youre thinking? <br />ALAMEDA:No, I just was thinking maybe we should let the testifiers testify -. <br />GRAHAM:Oh, all of them? <br />ALAMEDA:Yeah. We make notes, if not written mental notes, and then when the <br />Director comes back then we can pretty much address all of it at once, rather than go back and <br />forth. <br />GRAHAM:Well, I think Ms. Wille and maybe the other gentleman all want to testify <br />on the same topic. If thats the case, it sounds very reasonable to do what you say. But if <br />somebody is testifying on South Kohala and somebody else wants to testify on Hilo it seems like <br />maybe we should get the Director and the questions in between. <br />ALAMEDA:One at a time. Okay, thats fine. <br />GRAHAM:So, anyway -. <br />WILLE:Im on the same topic. <br />7EXHIBIT C <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.