2006-04-07 TAinaloa - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

FULKS:We discussed the possibility of a settlement but not the $500,000. TORIGOE:So, and at this point in time, you dont actually represent any community group, do you, I mean, as far as this particular case goes? Youre just an individual intervenor, correct? FULKS:No, its not entirely true because Hawaiian Acres Community Association has asked me to represent them in this matter. TORIGOE:But in terms of the appeal to date, arent you just an individual intervenor? FULKS:Whats that? TORIGOE:In terms of being a party to this Use Permit condition amendment proceedingand,youknow,whatwentbeforeJudgeHara,youwerejustanindividual intervenor in this case, correct? FULKS:Thats basically correct. Yes, Im basically representing myself. TORIGOE:And, so, Im just trying to get clear, because before I talk to the Planning Commission, you know, that at this point in time we have an agreement basically between the Planning Director and Ainaloa Development Corporation to propose a settlement for the Commission. And, so, I think the Commission really needs to have a sense of whether, you know, you are in some sense objecting to this settlement at this point or -. Because I havent, I think youve had opportunities to be involved in the discussions prior to this but weve never heard any objections from you. FULKS:This number of $500,000 was never discussed in our meetings. Ms. Song, Sandra, informed me of the agreement between the developer and the County. TORIGOE:And she sent you a copy of the proposed Order of Remand to look at, correct? FULKS:I have a copy here that she gave me. TORIGOE:Okay. Before the Judge signed the Order, you had an opportunity to review the Order which states the $500,000, right? FULKS:Not that Im aware of. TORIGOE:There was a, Ms. Song --. Did you receive from Ms. Song by mail a copy of the proposed Order for the Judge to sign? FULKS:Pardon? 16EXHIBIT D