Laserfiche WebLink
50 lots, frankly, there is no fair share. Because if it€s within his existing zoning, the <br />County currently does not impose fair share and he wouldn€t need a permit for that. He <br />could, you know, he could do a subdivision under his existing zoning. If he came in for <br />rezoning, I just don€t know because it would depend on if the County passed an impact <br />fee ordinance which we don€t have right now; and under their existing policy, they€re not <br />even imposing fair share on anything that€s larger than one acre. So I think it€s just too <br />speculative. <br />ALAMEDA:Mr. Director? You€d like to comment on that? <br />LEITHEAD-TODD:You€re asking if he paid the half a million, right? <br />YUEN:Yeah, you know, the scenario would be if he paid the half a million <br />and then did not eventually develop the property and then came in with a completely <br />differentproject,thatIcan€tseehowitwouldbecreditedagainstthecompletelydifferent <br />project. There€s no, not only there€s no mechanism for it -. And there€s no, you€ve paid <br />money toward an impact of one project and then you have a completely different project, <br />that I don€t see any credit for it. We haven€t negotiated that there would be a credit. And <br />there€s, if anybody comes in for, you know, what fees are required depends upon on what <br />kind of, a fee itself is a little bit unusual, it€s more typically that you have to make an <br />improvement. As far as if the County passed an impact fee ordinance, it might apply to <br />the subdivision of this property; but I don€t think that -. The impact fee would not credit <br />something that was paid for the golf course of the property, if there was a subdivision. <br />So I just don€t really see a credit against a completely different project. And if, Ms. <br />Song, do you see a scenario? I don€t really see a scenario. <br />SONG:I can€t speculate. But if my client decides to pay the money to <br />keep his permit alive and doesn€t want to start the golf course in the next year, essentially <br />the money is paid, he can€t get that money back. That€s it. The County gets the money <br />and hopefully they spend it on Ainaloa Boulevard, or whatever they want to do for the <br />road improvement, but that€s money he has lost. So ultimately if he decides not to do the <br />golf course, the County still has that money. <br />YUEN:I believe actually he has, if he paid the money, he would have <br />more than a year because he would then have the full time period of the permit that was <br />granted, but --. <br />SONG:Right, right. But I€m saying --. <br />YUEN:But in a scenario where then that lapsed and there was no further <br />time extension and the permit lapsed, I don€t really see a scenario where they would be <br />credited against a further project. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. You may have answered Commissioner Siracusa€s question <br />already. <br />22EXHIBIT D <br /> <br />