My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-04-07 TAinaloa
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-04-07 TAinaloa
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 12:41:35 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 12:41:30 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
50 lots, frankly, there is no fair share. Because if its within his existing zoning, the <br />County currently does not impose fair share and he wouldnt need a permit for that. He <br />could, you know, he could do a subdivision under his existing zoning. If he came in for <br />rezoning, I just dont know because it would depend on if the County passed an impact <br />fee ordinance which we dont have right now; and under their existing policy, theyre not <br />even imposing fair share on anything thats larger than one acre. So I think its just too <br />speculative. <br />ALAMEDA:Mr. Director? Youd like to comment on that? <br />LEITHEAD-TODD:Youre asking if he paid the half a million, right? <br />YUEN:Yeah, you know, the scenario would be if he paid the half a million <br />and then did not eventually develop the property and then came in with a completely <br />differentproject,thatIcantseehowitwouldbecreditedagainstthecompletelydifferent <br />project. Theres no, not only theres no mechanism for it -. And theres no, youve paid <br />money toward an impact of one project and then you have a completely different project, <br />that I dont see any credit for it. We havent negotiated that there would be a credit. And <br />theres, if anybody comes in for, you know, what fees are required depends upon on what <br />kind of, a fee itself is a little bit unusual, its more typically that you have to make an <br />improvement. As far as if the County passed an impact fee ordinance, it might apply to <br />the subdivision of this property; but I dont think that -. The impact fee would not credit <br />something that was paid for the golf course of the property, if there was a subdivision. <br />So I just dont really see a credit against a completely different project. And if, Ms. <br />Song, do you see a scenario? I dont really see a scenario. <br />SONG:I cant speculate. But if my client decides to pay the money to <br />keep his permit alive and doesnt want to start the golf course in the next year, essentially <br />the money is paid, he cant get that money back. Thats it. The County gets the money <br />and hopefully they spend it on Ainaloa Boulevard, or whatever they want to do for the <br />road improvement, but thats money he has lost. So ultimately if he decides not to do the <br />golf course, the County still has that money. <br />YUEN:I believe actually he has, if he paid the money, he would have <br />more than a year because he would then have the full time period of the permit that was <br />granted, but --. <br />SONG:Right, right. But Im saying --. <br />YUEN:But in a scenario where then that lapsed and there was no further <br />time extension and the permit lapsed, I dont really see a scenario where they would be <br />credited against a further project. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. You may have answered Commissioner Siracusas question <br />already. <br />22EXHIBIT D <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.