2006-04-07 TTripp - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

people with the big bucks that can come in and do affordable housing and those kinds of projects, any real clear directive on how were going to address these issues. And in my mind, the community development plan is authorized by the General Plan Amendments, adopted last year; and the one for Hilo and all of them for the entire island in my mind can be used as a vehicle to address the housing issue now, to be specific about how affordable housing is going to be addressed. I know this is not -. And the way my view is as to your request, you know, I commend what you want to do, you know, obviously youre the business person, you know, youre probably going to make it work and make money. But in the big picture from where I sit as a Commissioner and what I believe my job is, is to look at the big picture and how your project fits into the big picture. You know, my sense is that most of this panel is going to go along with your request. But Im speaking towards taking a bigger picture and that denying your request at this time is not going to be a devastating thing in terms of where the commercial development, you know, and how the commercialdevelopmentisgoingtotakeplaceinthiscity,andthatwereallyneedtolookatthat big picture. And if after the community development plan is done and, in fact, your property is within the commercial area, great. Right? It will work. But I really, if we dont start taking a stand about this as a body and we allow on a piece-meal by piece-meal basis every month coming here and approving one by one this type of request, then in my mind theres really no plan to do it. The fact that the General Plan allows for Medium Density Urban use is a really, its not a fine planning tool. You know, within that area you can have everything from 7- Elevens to apartment buildings; but it doesnt tell you where and how it should be done. Thats what the community development plan is for, in my mind, and thats how it should be done. And in that way we can address the bigger issues. The way were proceeding now as a body, we have no way to address these bigger issues. These housing concerns, some of us really feel that there is a real problem with that and it should be addressed; and in my mind it is a determinate factor, were taking a house out of use, you know, and were allowing you and people to do that. That just aggravates the problem. And we cannot really turn a blind eye to that. Were a policy board. Were supposed to be implementing policies and looking at the big picture. And by turning a blind eye to the fact that were taking a dwelling out of the housing market, I think that cumulatively it adds up and it cannot make things better. We need a better process to do that. So all of that said, I apologize for the length of it, but thats the basis for my voting nay on this application. ALAMEDA:Thank you, Commissioner Iwashita. Fellow Commissioners, let me just remind you that this is a discussion opportunity and the discussion opportunity is really for us to discuss with each other. So try to refrain from making further comments directed to the applicant. Theyre off the hot seat already, so -. Commissioner Galdones? IWASHITA:I did not intend to place the applicant on the hot seat and I was simply trying to -. And I dont know if its improper but it is -. My view is a bigger view and in my mind, right, so -. ALAMEDA:Thats fine, thats fine. Just direct it to us, your Fellow Commissioners. I would appreciate that, Commissioner Iwashita. INWASHITA:Okay. Well, Ms. Tripp, if I offended you in any way, I apologize. 13EXHIBIT A