My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2022-05 Department of Finance Real Property Tax Division Revenue Cycle Management
PublicDocuments
>
Legislative Auditor
>
Audit Reports
>
2022-05 Department of Finance Real Property Tax Division Revenue Cycle Management
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/9/2023 3:38:53 PM
Creation date
9/14/2022 1:36:52 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
list despite extensive outreach. Title companies generally view the work as high-risk-reward and <br />low-margin. RPT has also attempted to recruit in-house abstractors who can perform title <br />searches inhouse but has been unable to acquire the highly specialized skillset. RPT stated that <br />while they value the title company's role in helping to demonstrate due diligence, changes in the <br />business environment could threaten RPT's current standard operating procedures. <br /> <br />To address the changes in the business environment, RPT must either: <br /> <br /> • Develop alternatives <br /> • Increase external capacity <br /> • Develop internal capacity <br /> <br />Because of the challenges cited above, developing alternatives is the most achievable outcome <br />and is mainly within the division's control. The item paramount to the issue is the notification to <br />the taxpayer and what constitutes proper due diligence. Chapter 19 has significant variance in <br />what constitutes reasonable due diligence and is written around specific activities. For example, <br />the RPT administrator may require owners to produce returns to form the basis of a sound <br />appraisal and for assessment purposes. Notification of this activity is fulfilled in section 12 by <br />public notice through publication, compelling a response from "every person owning, or having <br />possession, custody or control of, real property whether entitled to exemption or not." <br /> <br />By contrast, Chapter 19 Section 16, Notices, how given. Are deemed to be sufficiently recognized <br />according to the date on the notice and when properly mailed to the address "at the addressee's <br />last known address or place of business." <br /> <br />Contrasted again, Chapter 19 Section 40, par (b), (2), "If the address of the owner is known <br />or can be ascertained by due diligence, including an abstract of title or title search, the director <br />shall send to each owner notice of the proposed sale by registered mail, with request for <br />return receipt. If the address of the owner is unknown, the director shall send a notice to the <br />owner at the owner's last known address as shown on the records of the department of <br />finance." <br /> <br />Cause and Condition <br />RPT's tax foreclosure procedures enumerated in Chapter 19 depend on financial constraints, title <br />company's ability, capacity, and risk tolerance. <br /> <br />Effect <br />If the current title company discontinues its services in this sector, RPT cannot perform one of its <br />core functions. <br /> <br />Recommendation 7 <br /> <br />Due Diligence <br />We recommend that RPT work with the Office of Corporation Counsel to amend Chapter 19-40 <br />and subsections, improving options to satisfy "ascertaining ownership" and "notification <br />requirements, " assuming no third-party title company is meaningfully involved. <br /> <br /> <br />37 Page <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.