My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011-04-07 EXHIBITB
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2011
>
2011-04-07 EXHIBITB
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 1:47:35 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 1:47:29 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
KERN: Yeah -. <br />R. FERRAZI: Thank you for letting me speak today. I'm very, ve <br />the contest case hearing and I represent the PepeÓeke Point, not PepeÓeke Point, Gardens <br />Association. I was very, very depressed when I got the report from your Mr. Crudele. And then I <br />thought he would summarize some of the issues that we brought up <br />Chairman said he read all of the evidence over there. If he has <br />six days of producing evidence and talk, in my opinion, here has been ignored. There wasnÓt one <br />point that we brought up that was mentioned in that report. I would hope that you would take <br />some time to dig through that evidence and look at our findings. <br />and beauty of this island; and I don't think this plant will do <br />you. <br /> <br />KERN: Thank you. Any questions from Commissioners? Seeing non <br />Patricia Ferazzi, name and address, and you may begin. Please u <br /> <br />P. FERRAZI: My name is Patricia Ferrazi, 28-338 Higa Road, Pepe. And my concerns are <br />about the permit application itself, the amendment. And my back <br />advanced degrees, and including areas of expertise in research d <br />very weak as a document. There has not been the one year collec <br />data. Some of the data was from the airport which has airflow p <br />PepeÒeke area. Some of it was from Honolulu. So there is a deficiency <br />have not complied with the basic requirements within the permit. <br />My second concern is the fact that the monitoring stations, the <br />wind direction was from the north. The prevailing wind direction is from the south. The <br />rd <br />amended, as of December 23 of last year, the correction still has not been made. But what <br />even more significant is the fact that Hilo is here to the south <br />will be three different sites one to three hours, some are 24-ho <br />done is that it should include peak levels, and then the percent <br />peak levels in respect to minimum requirements of EPA standards. <br />incorporated into the permit. Again, I have research design exp <br />deficiencies that should be included within the permit process. <br />original testimony. That should have been incorporated by Hu Ho <br />should include mean time. Mean time is not as significant as pe <br />EPA standards. Any researcher would know that those are just mi <br />included within a permit process. <br />Another concern is the fact that, as I indicated you have Hilo t <br />the collection, three spots that are within the permit. Then so <br />are from the south. You have the plant itself. What it means - <br />R. FERRAZI: You didnÓt say that quite right. <br />7 <br /> EXHIBIT B <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.