My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-04-16 TKAWAIHAE
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2010
>
2010-04-16 TKAWAIHAE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 1:48:54 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 1:48:50 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
GIFFIN: Mr. Chairman, I have a question of Bill. In the backgr <br />some of the historic findings starting on Page 27, I realize that, you know, these were not <br />significant, huge findings. But as a native Hawaiian, I am sensitive to these sites and I wondered <br />if there was going to be any special consideration for these findings. <br /> <br />B. MOORE: Let me -. The archaeological sites were really limited to walls, which are cattle <br />related. Most of them, one of our archaeological sites is a chassis of a truck that was left there by <br />the military. So, no, I donÓt anticipate weÓre going to have -. <br />sites are tent pegs, angle iron tent pegs that were left by the military, and they actually <br />constructed a small retaining wall front in the tent area. And thereÓs another small enclosure, <br />which the archaeologist felt was more related to the military being there than anything else. So, <br />no, we are not planning -. There were no sites related to Hawaiian occupation that we were <br />aware of; they were all related to post contact. And so we are not planning any special treatment <br />of these sites. <br /> <br />GIFFIN: So even Feature A, the wall? <br /> <br />B. MOORE: Again, if you, the wall was discussed in there as part of the tent; it was actually <br />built right along the line of tent stakes. So the archaeologist felt that was more related to the <br />armyÓs occupation there in building some kind of a barrier boundary with respect to the camping <br />site. <br /> <br />GIFFIN: I appreciate your explanation. And just on the record I wanted to congratulate you for <br />including Kep MalyÓs report, which I find very, very interesting in terms of the history of the <br />village. <br /> <br />BOWMAN: I have one more comment. I think thereÓre people who are a little older than I am <br />but, you know, there is recent historical significance of the area, the cattle ranching, and I would <br />love to see you somehow document some of that. I think it would be good for the local and the <br />tourists, yeah, the value of that in that area because that, you know, for us that grew up here that <br />was kind of a special area, if any of you remember the cattle go <br /> <br />B. MOORE: IÓm glad you brought -. We actually have, IÓd like to introduce Mark de Reus. <br />HeÓs our architect and he drew that pretty picture of the rendering. WeÓve been talking to him <br />about that concept about trying to incorporate some of the history, the cattle activities Î you <br />know, the military, you know, itÓs still part of the history there. But itÓs part of what we were <br />looking at, BobÓs partner and then Bob have been, you know, so we have been talking about this. <br />And thereÓre ways to incorporate it Î use some of the theme, use some of the story, as part of the <br />restaurant. So, no, so we are, absolutely thatÓs something that we are looking at. <br /> <br />GIFFIN: The richness of the area. <br /> <br />B. MOORE: Yes, yes. <br /> <br />BOWMAN: Thank you. <br /> <br />8 <br /> EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.