My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003-04-17 TKITAGAWA
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003
>
2003-04-17 TKITAGAWA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 1:50:18 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 1:50:17 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
FUJIKAWA:So, in other words, the Applicant's new proposed intention that's <br />going to be brought out to Public Works on their review again, and if it's acceptable <br />with them, can that be used? <br />YUEN:If they want to defer action here, we can do that, and have it <br />reviewed by Department of Public Works. At this point though, we, as I say, we <br />would stick with our position. I don't think that this was -, this was not specifically, <br />this proposal was not specifically in the application. Or was it? <br />FUKE:No. The proposal called for like access, both full movement <br />access on Kwili Street; and then it was then, you know, subsequently modified. I <br />think that the Public Works Department has expressed its position. The Planning <br />Director has expressed his position. So probably even if we go back and get their re- <br />review on what we're suggesting, you know, because the essence of what was <br />originally proposed and what we're suggesting has not changed, I -, my sense is that <br />the Public Works Department will probably not change their position, as well. <br />FUJIKAWA:Okay. <br />GALDONES:I think, Commissioners, as stated by Mr. Fuke, my take on it is <br />that they are not asking to have this matter deferred and to be conferred with the Public <br />Works. If it was the wish, if it's the wishes of the Commissioners to accept the <br />recommendation as proposed by the Department, the Applicant will be willing to live <br />by that. So are there any further discussions or any questions of Mr. Fuke? If not, is <br />there anyone from the public who wishes to testify on this subject matter? Seeing none, <br />Commissioners, the recommendation of the Department is to give a favorable <br />recommendation and it be forwarded to the County Council. What is the wishes of the <br />Commissioners? Commissioner Springer. <br />SPRINGER:With regard to the change of zone application by I. Kitagawa and <br />Co., Ltd., REZ 03-002, I move that a favorable recommendation of the change of zone <br />request from a Single Family Residential (RS-10) to Industrial-Commercial Mixed Use <br />(MCX-20) zoned district be forwarded to the County Council, including the <br />amendments to Condition C as stated by Staff. <br />FUJIKAWA:I second. <br />GALDONES:It has been moved by Commissioner Springer and seconded by <br />Commissioner Fujikawa that application by I. Kitagawa and Co., Ltd., Change of Zone <br />Application REZ 03-002, be given a favorable recommendation of the change of zone <br />request from a Single Family Residential (RS-10) to the Industrial-Commercial Mixed <br />Use (MCX-20) zoned district, that it be forwarded to the County Council, with the <br />amendment to Condition C, second sentence. Are there any discussions on the motion? <br />Commissioner Graham. <br />9 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.