Laserfiche WebLink
YUEN:Well, but they are under common ownership now. And if the <br />condition goes through as stated, then they would be able to sell it off as a separate <br />parcel. But in knowing that they needed to develop the property, they would have to <br />retain an easement. The owner of 37 would retain an easement over 38 for their access <br />to Laukapu Street. And the owner of 38 would need an, would need an easement over <br />37 for the access to Kwili Street and also the common, and even further because there <br />is a common circulation that people can go over to the next property. But that would <br />be, from a legal point of view, of your being able to handle that, you would be able to <br />do that. <br />KUBOTA:Mr. Chair? <br />GALDONES:Commissioner Kubota. <br />KUBOTA:Yeah, okay. The point that I was trying to get at is Mr. <br />Planning Director, that we seem to be placing an inordinate amount of stringency on <br />the egress and ingress on these lots. I believe in safety but, you know, when you have <br />extenuating circumstances that prevail, I think we ought to flex a little bit. I don't, I <br />still don't think it's unreasonable to allow access points on Laukapu Street for each of <br />the lots that are there, 37 and 38. As I understand it, and correct me if I'm wrong, the <br />access points will be for egress only and not for ingress? <br />KAWAHA:Commissioner -. <br />KUBOTA:Is that what you're asking for? <br />GALDONES:Mr. Fuke. <br />FUKE:We are requesting that on Laukapu Street they be, that first <br />parcel, Parcel 37, be afforded the same condition as what was granted to Kitagawa, <br />which is -. <br />KUBOTA:Which is -? <br />FUKE:Right turn movement on Kwili Street and full access on, in this <br />case -. <br />KUBOTA:And what? <br />FUKE:Right turn movement only on Kwili Street. <br />KUBOTA:Yeah. <br />FUKE:And full movements on Laukapu Street. <br />13 <br /> <br />