My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2022-09-01 Windward Exh A (Item 1 Renegade Towers PL-USE-2022-000004)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2022
>
2022-09-01 Windward Exh A (Item 1 Renegade Towers PL-USE-2022-000004)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2022 1:54:57 PM
Creation date
10/6/2022 1:54:49 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Residential-10 acre shown in light green, Agricultural Residential-10 acres shown in light green <br /> and to the west a mix of Forest Reserve and Agricultural-20 acres. <br /> Here is the State Land Use Boundary Map. The SLU designation for the subject property is <br /> Agricultural indicated in green with State Land Use Conservation land indicated in the light blue, <br /> which is part of the Hilo Forest Reserve. The General Plan LUPAG. The General Plan Land <br /> Use Plan Allocation Guide (LUPAG) map designated for the subject parcel as Extensive <br /> Agriculture which is indicated in white. The aqua color indicated the conversation, Conservation <br /> area which is consistent with the Hilo Forest Area that's on the left side and the mustard yellow <br /> area is designated Rural which is where the Kaumana City subdivision is. Finally, the light <br /> green towards the bottom on the slide is Important Agricultural Land. <br /> Here are a couple images from the applicant. The top left image is a site plan showing the <br /> nearby tower located towards the bottom left of the site plan and the right-side image is a blown- <br /> up version of that area. And this is the applicant's elevations of the tower, one from the south <br /> and one from the east. Here's the aerial view. Again, the property is outlined in blue in the <br /> middle showing Kaumana City towards the top and the image on the right is a blown-up version <br /> of the subject property. <br /> Here's an image standing from, standing on Kaumana Drive looking at the proposed driveway <br /> location. The image on the left from Kaumana Drive as well looking makai with the subject <br /> property on the right and the image on the right standing on Kaumana Drive looking mauka, the <br /> subject property is on the left. <br /> Here are some photo simulations provided by the applicant. The existing view of the subject <br /> property from Daniel K. Inouye Highway is the top left and the bottom right shows the proposed <br /> subject property again from Daniel K. Inouye Highway and it's indicated proposed 180-foot <br /> tower. Here's another simulation. This one is from Kaumana Drive looking mauka from <br /> Kaumana Drive and the bottom right is with the in a view with the proposed tower. This existing <br /> view of the property looking makai from Kaumana Drive. Again, with the image on the right <br /> showing what the tower would look like. This is on Opalipali Street looking in the direction of <br /> the subject property. The left is the existing and the right would be with the tower, the 180-foot <br /> tower. <br /> Here is a, provided again by the applicant of what the coverage is going to look like. The left is <br /> the existing and the right is the projected and of course the subject property is located in the <br /> middle there's the bottom on the right-side map looks like in blue. We provided this location <br /> map just to show where the previously located, previously approved back in 2016. I believe it <br /> was July 7t', 2016 across Daniel K. Inouye Highway where the yellow star is indicated on the <br /> map. That's roughly about 1.2 miles from the subject property and of course with Kaumana City <br /> in the back. According to our applicant as well, the person who applied for that application back <br /> in 2016 have sold the property. So, there is a new owner who according to the applicant is not <br /> interested in doing the tower at this time. <br /> 4 <br /> EXHIBIT A <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.