My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
PD RECOMMENDATION REPORT (PL-REZ-2022-032)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
2022
>
2022-10-20 Leeward
>
Item #2 Sunshine Holdings, LLC (PL-REZ-2022-000032)
>
PD RECOMMENDATION REPORT (PL-REZ-2022-032)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/13/2022 10:50:11 AM
Creation date
10/11/2022 9:37:53 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
appropriate and would be an exclusion to a Chapter 10 permit. If the applicant or any <br /> individual lot owner chooses to take advantage of this process, they can do so under the <br /> auspices of current County Code. Based on the preceding, the Planning Director <br /> recommends approval of the requested deletion of Condition G and addition of a new <br /> standard condition requiring compliance with Chapter 10 of the Hawaii County Code <br /> (Erosion and Sedimentation Control). <br /> The applicant is requesting to amend Condition M to clarify that fair share <br /> assessment applies only to the additional lots to be created, and that the values of the fair <br /> share contributions are updated to current requirements. While the applicant proposed <br /> specific language amending the condition to address the preceding, the Planning Director <br /> recommends updating the condition to apply all of the fair share assessment to <br /> Mamalahoa Highway/Kaloko Drive intersection as has been standard with other recent <br /> zone changes in the area. <br /> Finally, while the applicant also requested the possibility of an administrative <br /> time extension for timed conditions of the ordinance, the Department's common practice <br /> is to not add the administrative time extension condition to change of zone amendments <br /> as the original ordinance included that one-time privilege, and that timeframe to use the <br /> time extension has long passed. Furthermore, the applicant has not provided any <br /> compelling reason for the need for additional time. According to the application, the <br /> applicant will immediately submit subdivision plans upon amendment of the ordinance <br /> and with the removal of the requirement to submit recorded restrictive covenants and <br /> removal of the requirement to submit an archaeological study, the 5-year timeframe <br /> should be sufficient to secure final subdivision approval. <br /> Based on the preceding, the grating of the time extension and other proposed <br /> amendments would not be inconsistent with the original reasons for the granting of the <br /> change of zone. <br /> The request is not contrary to Chapter 205A,Hawaii Revised Statutes, <br /> relating to Coastal Zone Management. The project site is located approximately seven <br /> (7) miles from the nearest shoreline and is not situated within the SMA. Thus, the <br /> property will not be affected by coastal hazards and beach erosion. There are no <br /> identified recreational resources, historic resources, public access to the shoreline or <br /> -5- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.