My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
PD BACKGROUND & RECOMMENDATION REPORT (PL-CCI-2022-002)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
2022
>
2022-10-20 Leeward
>
Item #4 County Council Initiated Bill No. 194 (PL-CCI-2022-000002)
>
PD BACKGROUND & RECOMMENDATION REPORT (PL-CCI-2022-002)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/27/2022 10:41:21 AM
Creation date
10/11/2022 9:38:59 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
would eliminate these matters, unclogging LPC agendas, and allowing the Commissions to concentrate on matters over <br />which they do have authority. <br />10. Even PD and the Assistant PD are not against this Bill. They have testified that they are "neutral". They may say <br />they don't always hand out free delays„ but this author has found no record of that. And also found no record of any <br />true "beyond the control •" reasons for delayl <br />Below are some examples where the PD first handed out 5 to 15 year exzbtentions and then the LPC was asked for for <br />further extensions. The total delays most often went for 15 too 25 years, and som ,e even longer. The author would be <br />happy to elaborate and/or give further examples. <br />A. Big condo project in Keauhou, off of Alii Drive and Kam III Road., first approved about 20.years, then got extensions <br />from the PD, and then came before the LPC asking for further extensions to 2025, with no new impositions. PD <br />recommended approval. SOLD after initial approval. Likely to be SOLD again with that buyer to seek further delays. <br />Though requested, not even a contemporary traffic study was agreed to. <br />B. Palamanui, a huge commercial and residential project in North Kona, which is the darling of many County officials. It <br />was supposed to build a bypass road from Mamalahoa Highway to Queen Kaahumanu Highway, intersecting with streets <br />along the way, by 2005. It obtained free3 extensions to 2025, and has now sold to Nan Inc. The result: big traffic jams <br />on Mamalahoa and Palani all the way into Kailua Kona town, with plenty accidents, including fatalities. Expect Naqn Inc <br />to ask for further free delays with only 2005 impositions. <br />C. Diamond Resorts an SMA, time share condo project on Alii Drive makai, south of the hotel and tennis courts, first <br />approved about 1998. After completing only a parking garage cement monstrosity, blighing Kailua town,the project was <br />abandoned and SOLD. After the PD's delays, a further request for delay to 2025 was requested without impositions <br />other than those of 1998 by their representative Mr. Fuke. The PD recommended approval. An updated traffic study <br />was requested of Mr. Fuke, but he refused. Thankfully, a "sunset" clause was part of the approval, with which the <br />applicant has not complied. <br />D. LLCs controlled by well known developers for a big commercial and residential condo project on Queen Kaahumanu <br />and Kuakini Highways near Lako Street. This is where Kona's worst traffic jams are concentrated, on Queen <br />Kaahumanu from Lako Street north into town and south to Kainaliu The jams started around 2005. This project would <br />have dumped about a thousand more cars into the jams, particularly during rush hours. The ordinance for this project <br />EXPIRED in 2005, although representative Mr. Fuke claimed he extended it thru the PD to 2015. In 2020 the ordinance <br />was "resurrected", and a request for an extension to 2025 made along with a reduction of the prior impositions. Mr. <br />Fuke adressed the traffic problems by presenting a traffic study that ignored the biggest traffic generator in the area, <br />Henry Street mauka and makai, and argued that congestion cold be taken care of by the State widening Queen <br />Kaahumanu and/or completing the Alii Drive relocation. For these and a myriad of other reasons, the "resurrected" <br />project received a negative recommendation from then PD Yee, and a UNANIMOUS LPC. But then, in what in the <br />undersigned's opinion is a stunning show of disrespect for the PD and the LPC, the negative recommendation was <br />turned to positive under the leadership of East Hawaii Council person Ms. Kierkewitz!Thjen the projrct was promptly <br />SOLD to Big Springs Development LLC. Expect them to ask for further delays. <br />The Big Island, and particularly West Hawaii, wants quality development, infrastructure and affordable housing on a <br />measurable and definite scale and schedule. The Big Island, and particularly West Hawaii, will always attract <br />developers. Needs must be net contemporaneously. I's a very taxpayer expensive 25 years behind because of this <br />archaic system, which badly damages the PEOPLE WHOM YOU REPRESENT. Please suppolrt Bill 194. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.