Laserfiche WebLink
BOWMAN: Question, please. Mr. Yuen’s letter is being circulated? I haven’t seen it. <br />HAYASHI: Excuse me, Mr. Chair. <br />WATANABE: Yes. <br />HAYASHI: We are making copies for the Commissioners, and you should be getting it <br />shortly. <br />BOWMAN: Okay. I’d like to see it before we have our discussion. Thank you. <br />SIRACUSA: Could we maybe, when they are ready, at that point take a 5-minute recess <br />to allow us to review that? <br />WATANABE: Yeah, why don’t we go ahead and do that? We have a live motion on the <br />table. But before we enter into discussions, why don’t we take a recess, so that -. Yes, <br />Mr. Iwashita. <br />IWASHITA: Mr. Chair, if I may. I’d like to suggest, you know, my motion is for the <br />limited purpose of just getting the letters in -. <br />WATANABE: Right. <br />IWASHITA: So it seems like we can vote on that; and then we can have a main motion <br />on the substantive thing, and then we can discuss the letters at that time, if Members of the <br />Commission want. <br />WATANABE: So you’d like to have a vote on that -? <br />IWASHITA: It’s two levels, yeah. This is just a procedural matter. It’s real -. <br />WATANABE: Yeah, but I think that Ms. Bowman’s point is she wants to see the letter <br />before she even votes. Is that correct? <br />BOWMAN: Not to open the hearing, no. I mean, I’ll vote to reopen the hearing, but <br />I’d like to see the letters before we have a discussion. We can vote. <br />IWASHITA: Basically the suggestion is that we vote to allow it in, we take a break, we <br />can look at it then legally as part of the record, and then we come back after the break and we <br />can have a main motion. <br />WATANABE: Okay, okay. Yes, Mr. Woodward. <br />WOODWARD: Mr. Chairman, yeah. I think basically we are voting to admit these letters <br />into evidence, and that doesn’t necessarily reflect the fact that we’ve had a chance to review <br />EXHIBIT A <br />10 <br /> <br />