My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008-04-18 TKOHALA LLC
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2008
>
2008-04-18 TKOHALA LLC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2011 1:53:58 PM
Creation date
6/13/2011 1:53:54 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
WOODWARD: Well, I think you could probably, once a motion is made, that could be <br />part of discussion, if I’m correct. Is that correct, Mr. Torigoe? <br />TORIGOE: Well, the motion has been for a very limited purpose; so you would have <br />to amend that motion. <br />WOODWARD: Well, we’ve already voted on the motion to admit those documents, and <br />that passed. <br />SIRACUSA: But not the information that I got from Mr. Kahiapo. <br />WOODWARD: But I mean, if we make a motion to one way or another on the first item on <br />the agenda, the rezoning item -. <br />WATANABE: Yet, then the discussion will be limited to whatever is within the record <br />and not introduction of new material. <br />WOODWARD: Okay. <br />WATANABE: So are we clear on that? <br />SIRACUSA: Okay. Actually, what I learned wasn’t a hundred percent favorable to my <br />position anyways. But I felt I should in fairness bring it up. <br />WATANABE: Okay, but let’s -. Yeah, go ahead, Mr. Torigoe. <br />TORIGOE: Just for your information, if there is information that the Planning <br />Commission would like to see in the record, you can always ask the parties if they would <br />stipulate to put it in, you know. So that’s an option. <br />WATANABE: That would be a separate motion, though. What he is saying is if you want <br />to introduce that, we could reopen specifically again for that limited purpose, providing the two <br />parties agree. Now, again, I appreciate the fact that you are trying to be very open about this <br />even though, according to you, it doesn’t support your position. But I’m not sure that it would <br />be fruitful given, again, the voting record that we’ve experienced over the past few meetings, as <br />well as the fact that we are only an advisory position anyway. Thank you. <br />BOWMAN: I have a question. <br />WATANABE: Yes. <br />BOWMAN: I agree. I think, you know, it may not be at this meeting. But at some <br />point I would like to have more information because I, too, you know -. <br />WATANABE: With regard to ciguatera? <br />EXHIBIT A <br />12 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.