Laserfiche WebLink
VITOUSEK: Okay, and so, did you submit that directly to SHPD? <br /> CLARK: No, the project needs to come from the County. <br /> VITOUSEK: Okay, okay. <br /> CLARK: Yeah. <br /> VITOUSEK: So <br /> DEFRANCO: So if we submit this, then there will be that letter submitted with it, and there will <br /> be an oversight— <br /> ROY: Yeah <br /> DEFRANCO: right? <br /> ROY: we would do a 6E-42 review <br /> VITOUSEK: Yeah. <br /> DEFRANCO: Yeah, okay. <br /> ROY: I would go ahead and complete the HICRIS submission and submit his cultural impact <br /> analysis, all the work that was done,photographs, things like that, and we could just run through <br /> and allow SHPD to opine on that— <br /> VITOUSEK: Yep, to give them the opportunity <br /> ROY: To give them the opportunity if that— <br /> VITOUSEK: to review and comment. <br /> DEFRANCO: Okay. <br /> VITOUSEK: Okay, in that case, we could make a motion to defer the current motion that's on <br /> the floor to accept pending review by SHPD,pending 6E-42 process. <br /> DARROW: Sorry,just a suggestion, Chair. <br /> VITOUSEK: Yes. <br /> DARROW: You know, in the past, you remember we've had a lot of discussion on, we used to <br /> place conditions in the permits that were after-the-fact requirements of SHPD. I don't know if <br /> you want to consider it in this particular case whereI mean it's pretty thorough, as staff <br /> 16 <br /> EXHIBIT B <br />