My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2022-08-18 Leeward Exh B (Items 4 Meneghetti PL-SMA-2022-000017)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2022
>
2022-08-18 Leeward Exh B (Items 4 Meneghetti PL-SMA-2022-000017)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2022 12:30:29 PM
Creation date
10/25/2022 12:30:19 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
So here is just a floor plan, first floor, kind of showing the layout, the garage, the great room, the <br /> lanai, the pool, to kind of just give you some reference. <br /> And then I added the cross section showing you the mauka views and makai views, so what you <br /> would see from the ocean and then what you would see from the road. Of course, the one on the <br /> bottom is from the ocean. <br /> I added this slide because I knew one of the issues in this area is public access. So the thick red <br /> lineapproximately, as best as I could do it on a poor map—approximates the location of that <br /> access wall. So a citizen or public can walk from one end of that subdivision unimpeded all the <br /> way across to the recreation area. On top of that the three other arrows are kind of the mauka- <br /> makai access. There are two that run through the subdivision, and they have easements and in <br /> fact have parking on the mauka end of that. At the furthest end near the project site, it's pretty <br /> open, and I'm going to show you a picture here that will kind of give you better idea. <br /> So you can see the project site outlined in red, and then the generous public access in this area <br /> with plenty of parking—you can see there's only two vehicles parked there—and numerous <br /> trails, and then one could pick up that coastal trail and walk all the way along that, along the <br /> boundary. You can also walk, there is plenty of room to walk makai of that wall; there is a <br /> significant space. So public access along the shoreline and mauka to makai access through the <br /> subdivision, are provided and are existent. <br /> Here is a view of the project parcel from the access road looking makai towards the ocean. You <br /> can see it very cleared, open, and the walls that were previously permitted and constructed and <br /> are existing. <br /> This is a view from the public access path looking mauka towards the access road and beyond, so <br /> this would be just on that, on that access wall. <br /> Here is a shot kind of looking west roughly across the project parcel, and you can take note of <br /> the wall access there, the shoreline access there. And if any of you were wondering what the <br /> Flood Zone D was, Food Zone D is actually levees, and they consider this to be a levee type of <br /> structure, so that's where the Flood Zone DI know it threw a few people off, so I just kind of <br /> wanted to touch on that. It's a very uncommon one, you don't see it very often, but FEMA has <br /> decided that this in their mind constitutes a levee. <br /> And then here is from the public access wall looking east down towards Kailua Bay to kind of <br /> give you an idea what the shoreline looks like naupaka, in this area there is very little sand, <br /> very rocky. <br /> Just a reminder why we are here. Typically, single-family residences are exempt actions in the <br /> SMA, but because of the change in law that happened under Act 16 in 2020, those single-family <br /> residences that are on a shoreline parcel now are considered development, and this, the <br /> evaluation was 1.7 million, which was above the 500,000 threshold, so in that case it became the <br /> SMA Major; if it had fallen under 500,000, it would have been an SMA Minor permit. So now <br /> 3 <br /> EXHIBIT B <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.