Laserfiche WebLink
them on the list or not. There being no further discussions, Chr. Kelepolo called for a roll <br />call vote: Ms. Ward, Ms. Crivello, Ms. Rosam, Dr. Frank, Ms. Chang, Ms. Naungayan, Ms. <br />Kanealii, and Chr. Kelepolo all voted aye, with Mr. Lee excused. There being a unanimous <br />vote in favor of the motion, the motion passed. <br />Chr. Kelepolo continued to the next item on the agenda, and called for any public testimo- <br />ny, there being none, called for volunteers to write summaries of the 2022 Prioritized List. <br />2. ASSIGNMENT OF THE 2022 PRIORITIZED LIST SUMMARIES. <br />Chr. Kelepolo clarifies the purpose of the summaries, and the members of the commission <br />volunteered to write them (see above list with names in parenthesis). Reminder by Chr. <br />Kelepolo that the write-ups are due by October 21, 2022, or sooner to the secretary. <br />There being no further discussion, Chr. Kelepolo, called for a break at 10:49 a.m. She re- <br />convened the meeting at 10:58 a.m., moved on to the next item on the agenda, and called <br />testifier, Ms. Toni Withington to the microphone. <br />Ms. Withington testified on the next item on the Rules of Practice and Procedure of <br />the Hawaii County PONC specifically to rule 4.a. She gave a brief statement on the <br />importance of continuing to prioritize repetitive nominations with resolutions. She <br />said that prioritizing these properties each year helps with matching fund partners. <br />She continued that the requirement to have a willing seller landowner letter is a <br />"crazy idea." She presented examples of unwilling sellers for previous properties on <br />the prioritized list that have been purchased by the county or in the process of being <br />purchased. As a result, she continued to support the program and hopes the <br />commission addresses these items when making changes to the current rules. <br />There being no futher public testimony, Chr. Kelepolo continued to the next item on <br />the agenda and informed the commission that this is a discussion only on the pro- <br />posed revisions to Rule of Practice and Procedures of the Hawaii County PONC <br />Draft No. 1. <br />3. DISCUSSION REGARDING PROPOSED REVISIONS TO RULES OF PRACTICE AND <br />PROCEDURE OF THE HAWAI`I COUNTY PONC-DRAFT NO. 1. <br />The following discussions were held for the following said rules: <br />RULE 4. DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES <br />(a) Ms. Naungayan started the discussion with the issue requiring the nominator <br />to submit a letter from the landowner as a willing participant. She cited a past <br />situation where a landowner attended a meeting, very upset, with a letter from <br />a law firm, asking to remove them from the prioritized list. A lengthy <br />discussion ensude regarding willing participants and willing sellers letter as <br />noted on the current suggestion form, how on the assessment criteria form is <br />scored, the possibility of having the option to remove it from the list, and how <br />to draft this into the rule. Ms. Naungayan invited Ms. Campbell to the <br />microphone for some assistance in this matter. <br />PONC Minutes July 11, 2022 <br />Page 4 <br />