Laserfiche WebLink
of assessment on adjoining property and other investigations at this level. <br /> Landowners should seek approval for any required grubbing or grading <br /> permits. " (Exhibit D) <br /> Further, an archaeological field inspection was recently completed for a <br /> property proximate to this area wherein nothing was found. A copy of this <br /> letter from SHPD, dated May 17, 2022, is found in Exhibit F. <br /> Subsequent to the further comment by the SHPD on this application, in the <br /> event it is determined that this condition is still needed, the Applicant requests <br /> the following language as found in REZ 05-000027) be used: <br /> "An Archaeological Field Inspection shall be submitted for the review <br /> and approval of the State Department of Land and Natural Resources — <br /> State Historic Preservation Division (DNLR-SHPD) prior to the issuance <br /> of any land alteration permits or the submittal of plans for Final <br /> Subdivision Approval,whichever occurs first. The Applicant shall <br /> implement any preservation measures,which shall be shown on the final <br /> plat may, as recommended in the Archaeological Inventory Survey LAB <br /> or subsequent preservation plans." <br /> * Condition M: Modify the fair share requirement to have it applied only to the <br /> additional lots created and not the total number. This is a standard practice. <br /> Essentially, in addition to the aforementioned amendments, the other amendments <br /> are more editorial in nature and thus intended to make them consistent with <br /> conditions of recent rezoning and/or time extension requests. The Applicant <br /> further understands that there may be a need to update other conditions and will <br /> defer to the staff. <br /> V. INSTITUTIONAL CONSIDERATIONS <br /> A. State Land Use <br /> The entire site is within the Agricultural district. The proposed lot size (5+ <br /> acres) and intended use (family agriculture) would be consistent with the rules <br /> and regulations governing the State Land Use Agricultural District. <br /> B. County General Plan <br /> When the property was initially rezoned, the then August 1998 County General <br /> Plan Land Use Pattern.Allocation Guide (LUPAG) map designated the site <br /> Orchards which was described as "agricultural lands which though rocky in <br /> character and content support productive macadamia nuts, papaya, citrus and <br /> other similar agricultural products. " The existing LUPAG map (February <br /> 2005), however,redesignated the subject and essentially the rest of the Kaloko <br /> 9 <br />