My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2022-10-06 Windward Exh B (Item 2 County Council Initiated PL-CCI-2022-000002)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2022
>
2022-10-06 Windward Exh B (Item 2 County Council Initiated PL-CCI-2022-000002)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/3/2022 12:23:23 PM
Creation date
11/3/2022 12:23:13 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
you folks and that would be"language granting extensions of time by the Planning Director shall <br /> not be included in any Change of Zone ordinance". So, it's very clear as to the intention. <br /> KERN: If I may add to that. Um' to me that is almost more of a Council directive <br /> because you guys as Council as a former Councilmember have that authority to do that. And so <br /> when a rezoning is approved or not approved like that's your guys found decision. So, to me <br /> that's limiting the Council's ability not so much limiting the Director's ability if its, obviously, it <br /> has an impact on it for sure, but there's no latitude left at Council at that time would be my read <br /> of that. <br /> INABA: With that I still don't think that we should be including language that grants the <br /> authority again, the time is the time. So, if the Department says 10 years and you folks forward a <br /> favorable recommendation to us for 10 years, it's 10 years and I don't think at the last stage of <br /> the game a Councilmember should say oh no, but let's put language in that says the Director can <br /> give another 10 years. Then, you folks didn't have the opportunity to vet that language and of <br /> course, we can do things at the last stage of the game of course but, that runs contrary again to <br /> the intention. So, I do understand what Director Kern is saying though, but I don't want even the <br /> Council to be putting in language like that at the end. <br /> LIN: So, I think based on what I've heard from our fellow Commissioners and Director <br /> Kern. The understanding of this Planning Commission is, we agree with what you have to say <br /> regarding that language and I think maybe having it hashed out a little bit more at the Council <br /> level to make sure that your Corporation Counsel understands that it's not limiting or your power <br /> for that specific section. <br /> INABA: And I will add that I didn't have the opportunity to send language to you folks <br /> prior to today and we don't do like that right. It just goes through and the language that was in <br /> the Bill is what is in the Bill before, and it will remain the same. I'll have the same conversation <br /> with the Leeward Planning Commission, but I just want to make sure that when it comes back to <br /> the Council to make a decision on Bill 194, were not stuck up on the idea that you folks passed it <br /> with the current language and knowing the intention but didn't correct the language. You put us <br /> in kind of a funky place and of course everyone could look back at the record, which is provided <br /> to us when it comes back, but yeah. Just food for thought. <br /> LIN: So, any other discussion? Okay, if not, staff roll call vote. <br /> ANDREWS: So, at this time the motion is a favorable recommendation to County Council with <br /> the Director's recommendation. <br /> KEKAI: Yep. <br /> ANDREWS: Okay, Commissioner Aguinaldo? <br /> AGUINALDO: Aye. <br /> ANDREWS: Commissioner Daniele? <br /> 14 <br /> EXHIBIT B <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.