My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
PL-REZ-2022-000017 J. MATLOCK TESTIMONY 11.14.2022
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
2022
>
2022-11-17 Leeward
>
Item #2 Shawn Maile Nakoa, Esq. (PL-REZ-2022-000017)
>
PL-REZ-2022-000017 J. MATLOCK TESTIMONY 11.14.2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/15/2022 8:06:16 AM
Creation date
11/14/2022 10:02:42 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Aloha Planning Commissioners, <br />Thank you for this opportunity to comment on Item #2, Applicant: Shawn Maile Nakoa, Esq. (PL- <br />REZ-2022-000017), TMK: (3) 7-7-008:062. <br />I appreciate and have sympathy for the difficulties families face when dividing property both <br />real and personal among heirs. <br />It appears that for this application, family members had to petition the Court in order to try to <br />resolve inheritance issues. The Court came to a seemingly simple conclusion —to subdivide the <br />property, with one heir initially paying the up -front costs to do so. <br />However, this unfortunate familial circumstance does and should not exempt the parties <br />involved from the same requirements that any and every other owner/developer must follow. <br />Below are several instances where it appears attempts have been made to do much less than <br />the bare minimum that would be required of any other application. <br />Did Not Provide the Promised Notice <br />The application of February 12, 2022, submitted by Land Planning Hawaii (LPH), stated, <br />"...Notices of this application will become available by the posting of a sign on the property..." <br />I have personally checked on more than one occasion and there is no, and to my knowledge <br />has never been, visable signage at the entrance to the property at Pomaikai Street (the most <br />appropriate location) or off Kuakini Highway. Why was this not adhered to or enforced? <br />Avoided Municipal Wastewater Hookup and Fees <br />LPH's application initially stated that the subdivided properties' wastewater would be treated <br />via "Individual Wastewater Systems," i.e., not by connection to the municipal wastewater <br />system. It is curious that LPH would not have been aware of the requirement to connect to the <br />immediately adjacent municipal system. <br />Water Allotment Application Based on Old Records <br />Submitted with the application was a letter from October 10, 2010, from the Department of <br />Water Supply to a Realty company referencing a different subdivision application and allowing <br />one available unit of water for this property. The DWS replied to this current application <br />allowing two additional units, listing the current requirements and costs. It is puzzling why and <br />appears sloppy that LPH initially submitted a letter for another project that is over 12 years old. <br />Rare or Endangered Flora / Fauna Survey <br />"Although there were no professional surveys conducted... the applicant does not believe that <br />rare or endangered floral or fauna resources are likely to be found within the subject site... <br />Further, the suburban nature of the surrounding areas would make it less likely to find <br />endangered animal life in this area... " (emphasis added) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.