My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
PL-REZ-2022-000017 E. DUNN TESTIMONY 11.14.2022
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
2022
>
2022-11-17 Leeward
>
Item #2 Shawn Maile Nakoa, Esq. (PL-REZ-2022-000017)
>
PL-REZ-2022-000017 E. DUNN TESTIMONY 11.14.2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/15/2022 8:06:16 AM
Creation date
11/14/2022 3:05:19 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Tea >cninc -nv mniā¢,ision uoae wnere the riannina <br />Department/Director has the authority to reduce the type of SMA application <br />and how it is processed. <br />9. There's no sign at the site, either from Pomaikai Street (see Attachment 3), or <br />Kuakini Highway. Why? And how did this oversight happen? <br />3U. lne araae or the laraer DroDosed Darcei or z+ acres is Steep from Pomaika"I <br />Street and mauka to Kuakini Highway (see Attachment 3). It would be helpful to <br />know of the grade of the existing parcel, for the proposed three parcels, and <br />what Code - County or State - which clearly states the maximum grade for <br />access to this site for emergency and service (garbage, utility) vehicles. <br />. Please remove the ianauaae about an extension for this Droposai. As both <br />Planning Commissions heard Bill 194 (which, if approved by the Council, takes <br />back the authority of the Council for this decision), and recommend its intent <br />and language for approval by the Council, it is disingenuous to continue to <br />include this language in this, and future, planning recommendation reports. <br />i understand and aDDreciate that this rezone and subdivision reauest is different from <br />many other proposals the Leeward Planning Commission reviews. The parcel is owned <br />by four people - one of whom has passed away; there is a Court Order to facilitate (not <br />require) this proposal. However. there still are reauirements. industry standards. and <br />Planning practices that should be adhered to, whether this is a sophisticated developer <br />or a family dealing with subdividing land. The process is the process, and should be <br />applied to all development proponents. <br />Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this proposal in my neighborhood. <br />Elizabeth Dunn <br />4of6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.